Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
POINT/COUNTERPOINT: The LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of risk from low-level (less than 100 mSv/year) radiation, and Low levels of radon in homes should be considered harmful to health
1.A. M. Kellerer and H. H. Rossi, “The Theory of Dual Radiation Action,” Current Topics in Radiat. Res. Quart. 8, 85–158 (1972).
2.R. Cox, C. R. Muirhead, J. W. Stather, A. A. Edwards, and M. P. Little, “Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer at Low Doses and Low Dose Rates for Radiation Protection Purposes,” Documents of the NRPB 6, 1–77 (1995).
3.National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), “Principles and Application of Collective Dose in Radiation Protection,” Report No. 121 (NCRP Publications, Bethesda, MD, 1995).
4.Advisory Committee on Radiological Protection, “Biological Effects of Low Doses of Radiation at Low Dose Rate,” ACRP-18 (Atomic Energy Control Board of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1996).
5.J. H. Lubin and J. D. Boice, Jr., “Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta-analysis of eight epidemiologic studies,” J. National Cancer Institute 89, 49–57 (1997).
6.J. H. Lubin, L. Tomásek, C. Edling, R. W. Hornung, G. Howe, E. Kunz, R. A. Kusiak, H. I. Morrison, E. P. Radford, J. M. Samet, M. Tirmarche, A. Woodward et al., “Estimating Lung Cancer Mortality from Residential Radon Using Data for Low Exposures of Miners,” Radiat. Res. 147, 126–134 (1997).
7.J. M. Samet, “Indoor Radon Exposure and Lung Cancer: Risky or Not?—All Over Again,” J. National Cancer Institute 89, 4–6 (1997).
8.D. A. Pierce, Y. Shimazu, D. L. Preston, M. Vaeth, and K. Mabuchi, “Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950–1990,” Radiat. Res. 146, 1–27 (1996).
9.D. T. Goodhead, “Radiation Tracks in Biological Materials: Initial Damage in Cells, DNA and Associated Structures,” in Proceedings of the NCRP No. 13, edited by M. L. Mendelsohn (NCRP Publications, Bethesda, MD, 1992), pp. 25–37.
10.Federal Focus, Inc., Principles for Evaluating Epidemiologic Data in Regulatory Risk Assessment. Developed by an Expert Panel at a Conference in London, England, October 1995 (Federal Focus, Inc., Washington, DC, 1996).
11.S. Kondo, “Tissue-repair error model for radiation carcinogenesis,” Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Photobiol. (1996).
12.J. P. Morlier et al., “Lung cancer incidence after exposure of rats to low doses of radon: Influence of dose rate,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 56, 93–97 (1994).
13.A. Ootsuyama and H. Tanooka, “One hundred percent tumor induction in mouse skin after repeated beta induction in a limited dose range,” Radiat. Res. 115, 486–494 (1988).
14.V. Bond, “When is a Dose Not a Dose?” NCRP Lecture 15 (1992).
15.D. Billen, Radiat. Res. 124, 242–245 (1990).
16.UNSCEAR 1994 Report, Appendix B.
17.R. E. Rowland, A. F. Stehney, and H. F. Lucas, Radiat. Res. 76, 368–383 (1978).
18.D. A. Pierce et al., Radiat. Res. 146, 1–27 (1996).
19.A. B. Miller et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 321, 1285–1289 (1989).
20.B. L. Cohen, Health Phys. 68, 157–174 (1995).
Article metrics loading...