Full text loading...
Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype
1.D. P. Chakraborty, “The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images,” J. Digit. Imaging 12, 12–22 (1999).
2.Z. Jing, W. Huda, and J. K. Walker, “Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography,” Med. Phys. 25, 1111–1117 (1998).
3.J. Persliden and G. A. Carlsson, “Scatter rejection by air gaps in diagnostic radiology. Calculations using a Monte Carlo collision density method and consideration of molecular interference in coherent scattering,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 155–175 (1997).
4.R. Fahrig, J. G. Mainprize, N. Robert, A. Rogers, and M. J. Yaffe, “Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies,” Med. Phys. 21, 1277–1282 (1994).
5.H. Roehrig, T. Yu, and E. Krupinski, “Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook,” J. Digit. Imaging 8, 52–66 (1995).
6.J. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 1863–1874 (1997).
7.A. Karellas, I. Sechopoulos, I. Levis, A. C. Huber, and J. A. Pantazis, “Measurement of the x-ray spectra and tube potential in mammographic units with a self-calibrating compact cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detector,” Radiology 205, 301 (1997).
8.Title 21, United States Code of Federal Regulations, Part 900, 1998.
9.U. Bick, M. L. Giger, R. A. Schmidt, R. M. Nishikawa, and K. Doi, “Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms,” Radiographics 16, 1403–1411 (1996).
10.M. A. Kupinski and M. L. Giger, “Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 510–517 (1998).
11.S. S. Buchbinder, I. S. Leichter, P. N. Bamberger, B. Novak, R. Lederman, S. Fields, and D. J. Behar, “Analysis of clustered microcalcifications by using a single numeric classifier extracted from mammographic digital images,” Acad. Radiol. 5, 779–784 (1998).
12.M. A. Anastasio, H. Yoshida, R. Nagel, R. M. Nishikawa, and K. Doi, “A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms,” Med. Phys. 25, 1613–1620 (1998).
13.D. Wei, H. P. Chan, N. Petrick, B. Sahiner, M. A. Helvie, D. D. Adler, and M. M. Goodsitt, “False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: Global and local multiresolution texture analysis,” Med. Phys. 24, 903–914 (1997).
14.H. Yoshida, K. Doi, R. M. Nishikawa, M. L. Giger, and R. A. Schmidt, “An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms,” Acad. Radiol. 3, 621–627 (1996).
15.M. Kallergi, G. M. Carney, and J. Gaviria, “Evaluating the performance of detection algorithms in digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 26, 267–275 (1999).
16.L. T. Niklason et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology 205, 399–406 (1997).
17.U. E. Ruttimann, R. A. J. Groenhuis, and R. L. Webber, “Restoration of digital multiplane tomosynthesis by a constrained iteration method,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging MI-3, 141–148 (1984).
18.D. P. Chakraborty and G. T. Barnes, “An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography,” Med. Phys. 16, 7–13 (1989).
19.T. Asaga, S. Chiyasu, S. Mastuda, H. Mastuura, H. Kato, M. Ishida, and T. Komaki, “Breast imaging: Dual-energy projection radiography with digital radiography,” Radiology 164, 869–870 (1987).
20.F. L. Flanagan, J. G. Murray, P. Gilligan, J. P. Stack, and J. T. Ennis, “Digital subtraction in Gd-DTPA enhanced imaging of the breast,” Clin. Radiol. 50, 848–854 (1995).
21.M. B. Williams and L. L. Fajardo, “Digital mammography: Performance considerations and current detector designs,” Acad. Radiol. 3, 429–437 (1996).
22.D. W. Holdsworth, R. K. Gerson, and A. Fenster, “A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography,” Med. Phys. 17, 876–886 (1990).
23.R. M. Nishikawa, G. E. Mawdsley, A. Fenster, and M. J. Yaffe, “Scanned-projection digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 14, 717–727 (1987).
24.A. Karellas, L. J. Harris, H. Liu, M. A. Davis, and C. J. D’Orsi, “Charge-coupled device detector: Performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications,” Med. Phys. 19, 1015–1023 (1992).
25.S. Hejazi and D. P. Trauernicht, “System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 287–297 (1997).
26.J. H. Siewerdsen, L. E. Antonuk, Y. El-Mohri, J. Yorkston, W. Huang, J. M. Boudry, and I. A. Cunningham, “Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology,” Med. Phys. 24, 71–89 (1997).
27.L. E. Antonuk et al., “Performance evaluation of a large area, 97 μm pitch: Indirect detection active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for radiography and fluoroscopy,” Radiology 209, 357 (1998).
28.L. E. Antonuk et al., “Performance limits of high resolution large area active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs),” Radiology 209, 581 (1998).
29.L. E. Antonuk et al., “Strategies to significantly enhance performance of active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs),” Radiology 209, 358 (1998).
30.H. M. Rougeot, B. Opsahl-Ong, D. E. Castleberry, C. E. Landberg, J. Q. Liu, and C. M. Kimme-Smith, “Performance evaluation of a flat-panel filmless full-field digital mammography system,” Radiology 201, 190 (1996).
31.U. Neitzel, I. Maack, and S. Gunther-Kohfahl, “Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector,” Med. Phys. 21, 509–516 (1994).
32.W. Zhao and J. A. Rowlands, “Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency,” Med. Phys. 24, 1819–1833 (1997).
33.S. L. Garverick, L. Skrenes, and R. D. Baertsch, “A 32-channel charge readout IC for programmable, nonlinear quantization of multichannel detector data,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 30, 533–541 (1995).
34.H. Fujita, D. Y. Tsai, T. Itoh, K. Doi, J. Morishita, K. Ueda, and A. Ohtsuka, “A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11, 34–39 (1992).
35.J. T. Dobbins, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume, and D. C. Clark, “ of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices,” Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995).
36.J. T. Dobbins, “Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems,” Med. Phys. 22, 171–181 (1995).
37.M. L. Giger, K. Doi, and C. E. Metz, “Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. II. Noise Weiner spectrum,” Med. Phys. 11, 797–805 (1984).
38.C. D. Bradford, W. W. Peppler, and J. T. Dobbins, “Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system,” Med. Phys. 26, 27–37 (1999).
39.J. C. Dainty and R. Shaw, Image Science (Academic, New York, 1974).
40.H. E. Johns and J. R. Cunningham, The Physics of Radiology, 4th ed. (Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1983).
41.J. W. Byng, J. G. Mainprize, and M. J. Yaffe, “X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials,” Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 1367–1377 (1998).
42.R. M. Nishikawa and M. J. Yaffe, “SNR properties of mammographic film-screen systems,” Med. Phys. 12, 32–39 (1985).
43.P. Bunch, “The effects of reduced film granularity on mammographic image quality,” Proc. SPIE 3032, 302–317 (1997).
44.L. T. Niklason et al., “Improved detection of low contrast objects with full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography,” Radiology 205, 436 (1997).
45.R. E. Hendrick et al., “Low-contrast lesion detection: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography,” Radiology 205, 274 (1997).
46.A. Karellas et al., “Evaluation of a full-field clinical prototype flat panel imager for digital mammography,” Radiology 209, 159 (1998).
47.J. M. Lewin et al., “Clinical evaluation of a full-field digital mammography prototype for cancer detection in a screening setting—work in progress,” Radiology 209, 238 (1998).
48.L. Moss, C. J. D’Orsi, A. Karellas, E. Hendrick, J. Lewin, and G. Sisney, “Initial experience with a high resolution full field digital mammographic system,” J. Digit. Imaging 11, 110 (1998).
49.R. H. Moore et al., “Initial clinical experience with full-field digital mammography,” Radiology 205, 274 (1997).
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...