Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems — A contrast-detail phantom study
1.J. T. Dobbins III, J. J. Rice, and C. A. Beam, “Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography,” Radiology 183, 179–187 (1992).
2.L. T. Cook, M. F. Insana, M. A. McFadden, T. J. Hall, and G. G. Cox, “Comparison of the low-contrast detectability of a screen-film screen system and third generation computed radiography,” Med. Phys. 21, 691–695 (1994).
3.N. W. Marshall, K. Faulkner, H. P. Busch, and K. J. Lehmann, “The contrast-detail behavior of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 2289–2303 (1994).
4.J. H. Launders and A. R. Cowen, “A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 1393–1398 (1995).
5.U. Neitzel, A. Bohm, and I. Maack, “Comparison of low-contrast detail detectability with five different conventional and digital radiographic imaging systems,” Proc. SPIE 3981, 216–223 (2000).
6.M. J. Yaffe and J. A. Rowlands, “X-ray detectors for digital radiography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1–39 (1997).
7.L. E. Antonuk, K.-W. Jee, Y. El-Morhri, M. Maolinbay, S. Nassif, X. Rong, Q. Zhao, J. H. Siewerdsen, R. A. Street, and K. S. Shah, “Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications,” Med. Phys. 27, 289–306 (2000).
8.L. E. Antonuk, J. M. Boudry, Y. El-Mohri, W. Huang, J. H. Siewerdsen, J. Yorkston, and R. A. Street, “Large-area, flat-panel amorphous silicon imagers,” Proc. SPIE 2432, 216–227 (1995).
9.J. Chabbal, C. Chaussat, T. Ducourant, L. Fritsch, J. Michailos, V. Spinnler, G. Viex, M. Arques, G. Hahm, M. Hoheisel, H. Horbaschek, R. Schulz, and M. Spahn, “Amorphous silicon x-ray imaging sensor,” Proc. SPIE 2708, 499–510 (1995).
10.T. Graeve, Y. Li, A. Fabans, and W. Huang, “High-resolution amorphous silicon image sensor,” Proc. SPIE 2708, 494–498 (1996).
11.D. L. Lee, L. K. Cheung, and L. S. Jeromin, “A new digital detector for projection radiography,” Proc. SPIE 2432, 237–249 (1995).
12.W. Zhao and J. A. Rowlands, “X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat-panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology,” Med. Phys. 22, 1595–1604 (1995).
13.W. Zhao, I. Blevis, S. Germann, and J. A. Rowlands, “A flat panel detector for digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium,” Proc. SPIE 2708, 523–531 (1996).
14.A. Tsukamoto, S. Yamada, T. Tomisaki, M. Tanaka, T. Sakaguichi, H. Asahina, and M. Nishiki, “Development of a selenium-based flat-panel detector for real-time radiography and fluoroscopy,” Proc. SPIE 3336, 388–395 (1996).
15.P. C. Bunch, K. E. Huff, and R. Van Metter, “Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 902–909 (1987).
16.R. V. Metter and R. Dickerson, “Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system,” Med. Phys. 21, 1483–1490 (1994).
17.J. T. Dobbins III, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume, and D. C. Clark, “DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices,” Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995).
18.J. H. Siewerdsen, L. E. Antonuk, Y. El-Mohri, J. Yorkston, W. Huang, and I. A. Cunningham, “Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology,” Med. Phys. 25, 614–628 (1998).
19.D. Lee, L. K. Cheung, B. G. Rodricks, and G. F. Powell, “Improved imaging performance of a 1417-in. Direct Radiography system using a-Se/TFT detector,” Proc. SPIE 3336, 14–23 (1998).
20.S. W. Kengyelics, A. G. Davies, and A. R. Cowen, “A comparison of the physical imaging properties of Fuji ST-V, ST-VA, and ST-VN computed radiography image plates,” Med. Phys. 25, 2163–2169 (1998).
21.C. D. Bradford, W. W. Peppler, and J. T. Dobbins III, “Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system,” Med. Phys. 26, 27–37 (1999).
22.M. J. Flynn and E. Samei, “Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems,” Med. Phys. 26, 1612–1623 (1999).
23.P. R. Granfors and R. Aufrichtig, “Performance of a 41×41- amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications,” Med. Phys. 27, 1324–1331 (2000).
24.X. Liu, C. C. Shaw, X. J. Rong, and M. Lemacks, “Comparison of a-Si:H/CsI flat-panel digital imaging systems with CR and CCD based systems — Image quality measurements,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 389–398 (2001).
25.G. Cohen and F. A. DiBianca, “The use of contrast-detail-dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomgr. 3, 197–203 (1979).
26.G. Cohen, L. K. Wagner, S. R. Amtey, and F. A. DiBianca, “Contrast-detail-dose and dose efficiency analysis of a scanning digital and screen-film-grid radiographic system,” Med. Phys. 8, 358–567 (1981).
27.B. H. Hasegawa, R. K. Cacak, J. A. Mulvaney, and W. R. Hendee, “Problems with contrast-detail curves for CT performance evaluation,” Am. J. Roentgenol., Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 138, 135–138 (1982).
28.L-D. N. Loo, K. Doi, M. Ishida, C. E. Metz, H-P. Chan, Y. Higashida, and Y. Kodera, “An empirical investigation of variability in contrast-detail diagram measurements,” Proc. SPIE 419, 68–76 (1983).
29.G. Cohen, D. L. McDaniel, and L. K. Wagner, “Analysis in contrast-detail experiments,” Med. Phys. 11, 469–473 (1984).
30.C. A. Kelsey, R. D. Moseley, Jr., J. F. Garcia, F. A. Mettler, Jr., T. W. Parker, and J. H. Juhl, “ROC and contrast detail image evaluation test compared,” Radiology 154, 629–631 (1985).
31.K. Faulkner and B. M. Moores, “Contast-detail assessment of computed tomography scanners,” Phys. Med. Biol. 31, 993–1003 (1986).
32.W. Hillen, U. Schiebel, and T. Zaengel, “Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system,” Med. Phys. 14, 744–751 (1987).
33.N. W. Marshall, K. Faulkner, C. J. Kotre, and K. Robson, “Analysis of variations in contrast-detail measurements performed on image intensifier-television systems,” Phys. Med. Biol. 37, 2297–2302 (1992).
34.R. Aufrichtig, “Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography,” Med. Phys. 26, 1349–1358 (1999).
35.P. Xue, S. F. Schubert, and R. Aufrichtig, “Low contrast detectability and dose sayings with an amorphous silicon detector designed for x-ray radiography,” Proc. SPIE 3981, 194–200 (2000).
36.Du Pont Ultra-Vision film/screen system, “Du Pont Technical Publication, 1992, Du Pont, Wilmington, DE.
37.M. A. O. Thijssen, K. R. Bijkerk, and R. J. M. van der Burght, Manual Contrast-Detail Phantom CDRAD type 2.0. Project Quality Assurance in Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, St. Radboud, The Netherlands, 1998.
38.W. Huda, G. Qu, Z. Jing, B. G. Steinbach, and J. C. Honeyman, “How does observer training affect imaging performance in digital mammography?,” Proc. SPIE 3981, 259–266 (2000).
Article metrics loading...