Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Computer-based collection of mammographic exposure data for quality assurance and dosimetry
1.G. W. Eklund, G. Cardenosa, and W. Parsons, “Assessing adequacy of mammographic image quality,” Radiology 190, 297–307 (1994).
2.L. W. Bassett, “Quality determinants in mammography: Clinical image evaluation,” in 1995 Categorical Course in Breast Imaging, edited by D. B. Kopans and E. Mendelson. Radiographics, 1995, Vol. 15, No. 6, Supplement 1.
3.L. W. Bassett, A. J. Hollatz-Brown, R. Bastani, J. G. Pearce, K. Hirji, and L. Chen, “Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms,” Radiology 194, 189–192 (1995).
4.M. A. Helvie, H. P. Chan, D. D. Adler, and P. G. Boyd, “Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 163, 1371–1374 (1994).
5.A. Burch and D. A. Goodman, “A pilot survey of radiation doses received in the United Kingdom Breast Screening Programme,” Br. J. Radiol. 71, 517–527 (1998).
6.J. C. Heggie, “Survey of doses in screening mammography,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 19, 207–216 (1996).
7.R. Klein, H. Aichinger, J. Dierker, J. T. Jansen, S. Joite-Barfuss, M. Sabel, R. Schulz-Wendtland, and J. Zoetelief, “Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 651–671 (1997).
8.K. C. Young and A. Burch, “Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998,” Br. J. Radiol. 73, 278–287 (2000).
9.D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, “Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000).
10.K. C. Young, M. L. Ramsdale, and A. Rust, “Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system,” Br. J. Radiol. 69, 555–562 (1996).
11.D. C. Sullivan, C. A. Beam, S. M. Goodman, and D. L. Watt, “Measurement of force applied during mammography,” Radiology 181, 355–357 (1991).
12.A. R. Guest, M. A. Helvie, H. P. Chan, L. M. Hadjiiski, J. E. Bailey, and M. A. Roubidoux, “Adverse effects of increased body weight on quantitative measures of mammographic image quality,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 805–810 (2000).
13.R. A. Geise and A. Palchevshy, “Composition of mammographic phantom materials,” Radiology 198, 347–350 (1996).
14.W. T. Sobol and X. Wu, “Parametrization of mammography normalized average glandular dose tables,” Med. Phys. 24, 547–554 (1997).
15.N. A. Lee, H. Rusinek, J. Weinreb, R. Chandra, H. Toth, C. Singer, and G. Newstead, “Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20–83 years old: Comparison of x-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 168, 501–506 (1997).
16.L. E. Wilkinson, J. C. P. Heggie, and P. N. Johnston, “An investigation into the impact of anatomic variation upon mean glandular dose produced within a standard breast,” Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 22, 53–63 (1999).
17.S. E. Skubic and P. P. Fatouros, “The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast,” Med. Phys. 16, 544–552 (1989).
18.A. G. Haus and M. I. Yaffe, “Screen-film and digital mammography. Image quality and radiation dose considerations,” Radiol. Clin. North. Am. 38, 871–898 (2000).
19.R. L. Tanner, “Mammographic unit compression force: Acceptance test and quality control protocols,” Radiol. Clin. North Am. 184, 45–48 (1992).
Article metrics loading...