Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Quantitative evaluation of noise reduction strategies in dual-energy imaging
1.L. T. Niklason, N. M. Hickey, D. P. Chakraborty, E. A. Sabbagh, M. V. Yester, R. G. Fraser, and G. T. Barnes, “Simulated pulmonary nodules: Detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography,” Radiology 160, 589–593 (1986).
2.N. M. Hickey, L. T. Niklason, E. Sabbagh, R. G. Fraser, and G. T. Barnes, “Dual-energy digital radiographic quantification of calcium in simulated pulmonary nodules,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 148, 19–24 (1986).
3.R. G. Fraser, N. M. Hickey, L. T. Niklason, E. A. Sabbagh, R. F. Luna, C. B. Alexander, C. A. Robinson, A. A. Katzenstein, and G. T. Barnes, “Calcification in pulmonary nodules: Detection with dual-energy digital radiography,” Radiology 160, 595–601 (1986).
4.T. Ishigaki, S. Sakuma, and M. Ikeda, “One-shot dual-energy subtraction chest imaging with computed radiography: Clinical evaluation of film images,” Radiology 168, 67–72 (1988).
5.J. W. Oestmann, R. Greene, J. T. Rhea, H. Rosenthal, R. M. Koenker, C. L. Tillotson, K. D. Pearsen, J. W. Hill, and R. H. Velaj, “Single-exposure dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications,” Invest. Radiol. 24, 517–521 (1989).
6.J. T. Ho and R. A. Kruger, “Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection,” Invest. Radiol. 24, 861–868 (1989).
7.S. Kido, J. Ikezoe, H. Naito, S. Tamura, T. Kozuka, W. Ito, K. Shimura, and H. Kato, “Single-exposure dual-energy chest images with computed radiography: Evaluation with simulated pulmonary nodules,” Invest. Radiol. 28, 482–487 (1993).
8.F. Kelcz, F. E. Zink, W. W. Peppler, D. G. Kruger, D. L. Ergun, and C. A. Mistretta, “Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 162, 271–278 (1994).
9.S. Kido, J. Ikezoe, H. Naito, J. Arisawa, S. Tamura, T. Kozuka, W. Ito, K. Shimura, and H. Kato, “Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm,” Radiology 194, 407–412 (1995).
10.T. Ishigaki, S. Sakuma, Y. Horikawa, M. Ikeda, and H. Yamaguchi, “One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging,” Radiology 161, 271–273 (1986).
11.B. K. Stewart and H. K. Huang, “Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography,” Med. Phys. 17, 866–875 (1990).
12.D. A. Hinshaw and J. T. Dobbins III, “Plate scatter correction for improved performance in dual-energy imaging,” Med. Phys. 23, 871–876 (1996).
13.B. Jacobson, “Dichromatic absorption radiography. Dichromography,” Acta Radiol. 39, 437–452 (1953).
14.R. E. Alvarez and A. Macovski, “Energy-selective reconstructions in x-ray computerized tomography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 21, 733–744 (1976).
15.R. Rutherford, B. Pullan, and I. Isherwoord, “Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner,” Neuroradiology 11, 15–21 (1976).
16.C. A. Mistretta, M. G. Ort, F. Kelcz, J. R. Cameron, M. P. Siedband, and A. B. Crummy, “Absorption edge fluoroscopy using quasimonoenergetic x-ray beams,” Invest. Radiol. 8, 402–412 (1973).
17.F. Kelcz and C. A. Mistretta, “Absorption-edge fluoroscopy using a three-spectrum technique,” Med. Phys. 3, 159–168 (1976).
18.C. E. Floyd, Jr., R. J. Warp, J. T. Dobbins III, H. G. Chotas, A. H. Baydush, R. Vargas-Voracek, and C. E. Ravin, “Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography,” Radiology 218, 683–688 (2001).
19.P. R. Granfors and R. Aufrichtig, “Performance of a amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications,” Med. Phys. 27, 1324–1331 (2000).
20.P. C. Johns and M. J. Yaffe, “Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 12, 289–296 (1985).
21.A. Macovski, D. G. Nishimura, A. Doost-Hoseini, and W. R. Brody, “Measurement-dependent filtering: A novel approach to improved SNR,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging MI-2, 122–127 (1983).
22.D. G. Nishimura, A. Macovski, and W. R. Brody, “Noise reduction methods for hybrid subtraction,” Med. Phys. 11, 259–265 (1984).
23.Q. Cao, T. Brosnan, A. Macovski, and D. Nishimura, “Least squares approach in measurement-dependent filtering for selective medical images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 7, 154–160 (1988).
24.W. A. Kalender, E. Klotz, and L. Kostaridou, “An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 7, 218–224 (1988).
25.C. H. McCollough, M. S. Van Lysel, W. W. Peppler, and C. A. Mistretta, “A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography,” Med. Phys. 16, 873–880 (1989).
26.D. L. Ergun, C. A. Mistretta, D. E. Brown, R. T. Bystrianyk, W. K. Sze, F. Kelcz, and D. P. Naidich, “Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: Improved detection and processing,” Radiology 174, 243–249 (1990).
27.D. A. Hinshaw and J. T. Dobbins III, “Recent progress in noise reduction and scatter correction in dual-energy imaging,” Proc. SPIE 2432, 134–142 (1995).
28.J. T. Dobbins III, “Correlated polarity noise reduction for dual-energy imaging,” Radiology 201(P), 220 (1996).
29.D. L. Ergun, W. W. Peppler, J. T. Dobbins III, F. E. Zink, D. G. Kruger, F. Kelcz, F. J. de Bruijn, E. W. Bellers, Y. Wang, R. J. Althof, and M. G. J. Wind, “Dual-energy computed radiography: Improvements in processing,” Proc. SPIE 2167, 663–671 (1994).
30.R. Rutherford, B. Pullan, and I. Isherwoord, “X-ray energies for effective atomic number determination,” Neuroradiology 11, 23–28 (1976).
31.W. Ito, K. Shimura, N. Nakajima, M. Ishida, and H. Kato, “Improvement of detection in computed radiography by new single-exposure dual-energy subtraction,” J. Digit. Imaging 6, 42–47 (1993).
32.M. L. Giger, K. Doi, and C. E. Metz, “Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum,” Med. Phys. 11, 797–805 (1984).
33.G. T. Barnes, “Radiographic mottle: A comprehensive theory,” Med. Phys. 9, 656–667 (1982).
34.J. T. Dobbins III, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume, and D. C. Clark, “DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices,” Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995).
35.A. Oppenheim, R. Schafer, and J. Buck, Discrete-Time Signal Processing, 2nd ed. (Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999).
36.J. T. Dobbins III, “Image quality metrics for digital systems,” in Handbook of Medical Imaging—Vol. I Physics and Psychophysics, edited by J. Beutel, H. L. Kundel, and R. L. Van Metter (SPIE, Bellingham, 2000), pp. 161–222.
37.M. J. Flynn and E. Samei, “Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for and storage phosphor radiography systems,” Med. Phys. 28, 1612–1623 (1999).
Article metrics loading...