Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Vessel size measurements in angiograms: Manual measurements
1.G. M. Ansel, M. W. Burket, D. J. Kosinski, and J. Zeiss, “Current status of percutaneous vascular procedures,” J. Cardiol. 7, 85–92 (1995).
2.N. Hafeez, “Prevention of coronary restenosis with radiation therapy: a review,” Clin. Cardiol. 25, 313–22 (2002).
3.“American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents developed in collaboration with the European Society of Cardiology endorsed by the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions,” Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2, 299–313 (2001).
4.A. Vlodaver, R. Frech, R. A. Van Tassel, and J. E. Edwards, “Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen,” Circulation 47, 162–169 (1973).
5.C. M. Grondin, I. Dyrda, A. Pasternac, L. Campeau, M. G. Bourassa, and J. Lesperance, “Discrepancies between cineangiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization,” Circulation 49, 703–708 (1974).
6.L. M. Zir, S. W. Miller, R. E. Dinsmore, J. P. Gilbert, and J. W. Harthorne, “Interobserver variability in coronary angiography,” Circulation 53, 627–632 (1976).
7.K. M. Detre, E. Wright, M. L. Murphy and T. Takaro, “Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms,” Circulation 52, 979–986 (1975).
8.T. A. DeRouen, J. A. Murray, and W. Owen, “Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms,” Circulation 55, 324–328 (1977).
9.M. E. Sanmarco, S. H. Brooks, and D. H. Blankenhorn, “Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms,” Am. Heart J.96, 430–437 (1978).
10.J. Haase, C. DiMario, C. J. Slager, W. J. van der Giessen, A. den Boer, P. J. deFeyter, J. H. Reiber, P. D. Verdouw, and P. W. Serruys, “In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries,” Cathet Cardiovasc. Diagn. 27, 16–27 (1992).
11.R. L. Kirkeeide, P.Fung, R. W. Smalling, and K. L. Gould, “Automated evaluation of vessel diameter from arteriograms,” Comput. Cardiol. 215–218 (1982).
12.M. T. LeFree, S. B. Simon, G. B. J. Mancini, and R. A. Vogel, “Digital radiographic assessment of coronary arterial geometric diameter and videodensitometric cross-sectional area,” Proc. SPIE 626, 334–341 (1986).
13.G. B. J. Mancini, S. B. Simon, M. J. McGillen, M. T. Lefree, H. Z. Friedman, and R. A. Vogel, “Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method,” Circulation 75, 452–460 (1987).
14.R. A. Kruger, “Estimation of the diameter of and iodine concentration within blood vessels using digital radiography devices,” Med. Phys. 8, 652–658 (1981).
15.M. A. Simons, R. A. Kruger, and R. L. Power, “Cross-sectional area measurements by digital subtraction videodensitometry,” Invest. Radiol. 8, 637–644 (1986).
16.H. Fujita, K. Doi, L. E. Fencil, and K. G. Chua, “Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 2. Computerized determination of vessel sizes in digital subtraction angiographic images,” Med. Phys. 14, 549–556 (1987).
17.D. M. Weber, “Absolute diameter measurements of coronary arteries based on the first zero crossing of the Fourier spetrum,” Med. Phys. 16, 188–196 (1989).
18.K. R. Hoffmann, D. P. Nazareth, L. Miskolczi, A. Gopal, Z. Wang, S. Rudin, and D. R. Bednarek, “Vessel size measurements in angiograms: a comparison of techniques,” Med. Phys. 29, 1622–1633 (2002).
19.J. H. Reiber, P. van Eldik Helleman, C. J. Kooijman, J. G. Tijssen, and P. W. Serruys, “How critical is frame selection in quantitative coronary angiographic studies?” Eur. Heart J. 10(Suppl F), 54–59 (1989).
20.D. Keane, J. Haase, C. J. Slager, E. M. van Swijndregt, K. G. Lehmann, Y. Ozaki, C. di Mario, R. Kirkeeide, and P. W. Serruys, “Comparitive validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems, results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach,” Circulation 91, 2174–2183 (1995).
21.J. Haase, J. Escaned, E. M. van Swejndregt, Y. Ozaki, E. Gronenschild, C. J. Slager, and P. W. Serruys, “Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II),” Cathet Cardiovasc. Diagn. 30, 104–114 (1993).
22.E. Gronenschild, J. Janssen, and F. Tijdens, “CAAS II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography,” Cathet Cardiovasc. Diagn. 33, 61–75 (1994).
23.R. C. Chan, W. C. Karl, and R. S. Lee, “A new model-based technique for enhanced small-vessel measurement in x-ray cine-angiograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 243–255 (2000).
24.M. Sonka, G. K. Reddy, M. D. Winniford, and S. M. Collins, “Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 87–95 (1997).
25.P. M. van der Zwet and J. H. Reiber, “A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 24, 216–224 (1994).
26.D. R. Holmes, Jr., M. Savage, J. M. LaBlanche, L. Grip, P. W. Serruys, P. Fitzgerald, D. Fischman, S. Goldberg, J. A. Brinker, A. M. Zeiher, L. M. Shapiro, J. Willerson, B. R. Davis, J. J. Ferguson, J. Popma, S. B. King III, A. M. Lincoff, J. E. Tcheng, R. Chan, J. R. Granett, and M. Poland, “Results of Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its outcomes (PRESTO) trial,” Circulation 106, 1243–1250 (2002).
27.Digital Image Processing, edited by K. R. Castleman (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996), p. 124.
28.J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models (IRWIN, Chicago, 1996).
29.G. Verbeke and G. Molenberghs, Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000).
30.S. R. Searle, G. Casella, and C. E. McCulloch, Variance Components (Wiley, New York, 1992).
31.SAS, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 1999–2001.
32.K. Doi and K. Rossmann, “Comparison of convolution and ray-tracing methods for computing small blood vessel images in angiography,” Med. Phys. 4, 154–156 (1977).
33.K. Doi, L. N. Loo, and K. Rossmann, “Validity of computer simulation of blood vessel imaging in angiography,” Med. Phys. 4, 400–403 (1977).
34.J. Lesperance, L. Bilodeau, J. H. C. Reiber, G. Koning, G. Hudon, and M. G. Bourassa, “Issues in the performance of quantitative coronary angiography in clinical research trials” in What’s New in Cardiovascular Imaging, edited by J. H. C. Reiber and E. E. van der Wall (Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, 1998), pp. 31–46.
35.S. Rudin, D. R. Bednarek, C. Y. J. Yang, A. Gopal, A. Chattopadhyay, Y. Wu, Z. Wang, D. P. Narareth, and K. R. Hoffmann, “Region of interest (ROI) micro-angiography: Imager development,” Proc. SPIE 3977, 534–541 (2000).
36.C. A. Morioka, C. K. Abbey, M. Eckstein, R. A. Close, J. S. Whiting, and M. LeFree, “Simulating coronary arteries in x-ray angiograms,” Med. Phys. 27, 2438–2444 (2000).
Article metrics loading...