Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Test of GEANT3 and GEANT4 nuclear models for 160 MeV protons stopping in
1.J. Medin and P. Andreo, “Monte Carlo calculated stopping-power ratios, water/air, for clinical proton dosimetry (50–250 MeV),” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 89–105 (1997).
2.A. K. Carlsson, P. Andreo, and A. Brahme, “Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of proton pencil beams for computerized treatment plan optimization,” Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1033–1053 (1997).
3.H. Paganetti, J. Flanz, W. Newhauser, U. Titt, M. Wagner, and H. Kooy, “Monte Carlo studies for commissioning and beam characterization of the Northeast Proton Therapy Center,” (Abstract), Med. Phys. 29, 1326 (2002).
4.H. Paganetti, “Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: Dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 747–764 (2002).
5.S. Agosteo, C. Birattari, M. Caravaggio, M. Silari, and G. Tosi, “Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy,” Radiother. Oncol. 48, 293–305 (1998).
6.W. D. Newhauser, U. Titt, D. Dexheimer, X. Yan, and S. Nill, “Neutron shielding verification measurements and simulations for a 235-MeV proton therapy center,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 476, 80–84 (2002).
7.R. F. Laitano, M. Rosetti, and M. Frisoni, “Effects of nuclear interactions on energy and stopping power in proton beam dosimetry,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 376, 466–476 (1996).
8.B. Gottschalk, R. Platais, and H. Paganetti, “Nuclear interactions of 160 MeV protons stopping in copper: A test of Monte Carlo nuclear models,” Med. Phys. 26, 2597–2601 (1999).
9.J. F. Janni, “Proton range energy tables, 1 keV–10 GeV,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 27, 147–529 (1982).
10.H. C. Feselfeldt, “Simulation of hadronic showers: Physics and applications.” Technical Report RWTH Aachen PITHA 85-02, 1985.
11.A. Ferrari and P. R. Sala, “Intermediate and high energy models in FLUKA: Improvements, benchmarks and applications,” Conference Proceedings, Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, edited by G. Reffo, A. Ventura, and C. Grandi (SIF, Bologna, 1997), Vol. 59, pp. 247–253.
12.L. J. Verhey, A. M. Koehler, J. C. McDonald, M. Goitein, I.-Ch. Ma, R. J. Schneider, and M. Wagner, “The determination of absorbed dose in a proton beam for purposes of charged-particle radiation therapy,” Radiat. Res. 79, 34–54 (1979).
13.H. Palmans, J. E. Symons, J.-M. Denis, E. A. de Kock, D. T. L. Jones, and S. Vynckier, “Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3055–3071 (2002).
14.ICRU, “Nuclear Data for Neutron and Proton Radiotherapy and for Radiation Protection,” International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, Report No. 63, 2000.
15.U. Schneider, P. Pemler, J. Besserer, M. Dellert, M. Moosburger, J. de Boer, E. Pedroni, and T. Boehringer, “The water equivalence of solid materials used for dosimetry with small proton beams,” Med. Phys. 29, 2946–2951 (2002).
16.F. Carminati and I. Gonzalez Caballero, Geant4: A Benchmark of Hadronic Processes (CERN, Geneva, 2001).
Article metrics loading...