Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: A template matching scheme based on mutual information
1.R. T. Greenlee, M. B. Hill-Harmon, T. Murray, and M. Thun, “Cancer statistics, 2001,” Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 51, 15–36 (2001).
2.U.S. D.H.H.S., “Healthy People 2010 (Conference Edition, in Two Volumes),” Washington, DC, 2000.
3.L. Tabar et al., “Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography,” Lancet 1, 829–832 (1985).
4.R. E. Bird, T. W. Wallace, and B. C. Yankaskas, “Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography,” Radiology 184, 613–617 (1992).
5.R. L. Birdwell, D. M. Ikeda, K. F. O’Shaughnessy, and E. A. Sickles, “Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection,” Radiology 219, 192–202 (2001).
6.B. C. Yankaskas, M. J. Schell, R. E. Bird, and D. A. Desrochers, “Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: A community-based study,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 177, 535–541 (2001).
7.L. J. W. Burhenne et al., “Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography,” Radiology 215, 554–562 (2000).
8.T. W. Freer and M. J. Ulissey, “Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center,” Radiology 220, 781–786 (2001).
9.N. Petrick, B. Sahiner, H.-P. Chan, M. A. Helvie, S. Paquerault, and L. M. Hadjiiski, “Breast cancer detection: Evaluation of a mass-detection algorithm for computer-aided diagnosis—Experience in 263 patients,” Radiology 224, 217–224 (2002).
10.C. J. D’Orsi, “Computer-aided detection: There is no free lunch,” Radiology 221, 585–586 (2001).
11.B. Zheng, M. A. Ganott, C. A. Britton, C. M. Hakim, L. A. Hardesty, T. S. Chang, H. E. Rockette, and D. Gur, “Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: Preliminary findings,” Radiology 221, 633–640 (2001).
12.W. Qian, L. H. Li, and L. P. Clarke, “Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: Influence of wavelet analysis,” Med. Phys. 26, 402–408 (1999).
13.B. Zheng, Y. H. Chang, X. H. Wang, W. F. Good, and D. Gur, “Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm,” Acad. Radiol. 6, 327–332 (1999).
14.W. Qian, L. H. Li, L. P. Clarke, R. A. Clark, and J. Thomas, “Digital mammography: Comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection,” Acad. Radiol. 6, 471–480 (1999).
15.H. P. Chan et al., “Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces,” Med. Phys. 25, 2007–2019 (1998).
16.H. P. Chan et al., “Improvement of radiologists’ characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study,” Radiology 212, 817–827 (1999).
17.D. L. Thiele, C. Kimme-Smith, T. D. Johnson, M. McCombs, and L. W. Bassett, “Using tissue texture surrounding calcification clusters to predict benign vs malignant outcomes,” Med. Phys. 23, 549–545 (1996).
18.Z. Huo, M. L. Giger, C. J. Vybotny, D. E. Wolverton, R. A. Schmidt, and K. Doi, “Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms,” Acad. Radiol. 5, 155–168 (1998).
19.F. Schmidt et al., “An automatic method for the identification and interpretation of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 1231–1243 (1999).
20.M. A. Gavrielides, J. Y. Lo, R. Vargas-Voracek, and C. E. Floyd, “Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms,” Med. Phys. 27, 13–22 (2000).
21.S. Y. Yu and L. Guan, “A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 115–126 (2000).
22.W. Qian, X. J. Sun, D. S. Song, and R. A. Clark, “Digital mammography: Wavelet transform and Kalman-filtering neural network in mass segmentation and detection,” Acad. Radiol. 8, 1074–1082 (2001).
23.S. Paquerault, N. Petrick, H. P. Chan, B. Sahiner, and M. A. Helvie, “Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: Fusion of two-view information,” Med. Phys. 29, 238–247 (2002).
24.J. J. Heine, S. R. Deans, R. P. Velthuizen, and L. P. Clarke, “On the statistical nature of mammograms,” Med. Phys. 26, 2254–2265 (1999).
25.J. J. Heine and R. P. Velthuizen, “A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection,” Med. Phys. 27, 2644–2651 (2000).
26.C. E. Floyd, Jr., J. Y. Lo, and G. D. Tourassi, “Breast biopsy: Case-based reasoning computer-aid using mammography findings for the breast biopsy decisions,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 1347–1352 (2000).
27.A. O. Bilska-Wolak and C. E. Floyd, Jr., “Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADSTM lexicon,” Med. Phys. 29, 2090–2100 (2002).
28.Y.-H. Chang, L. A. Hardesty, C. M. Hakim, T. S. Chang, B. Zheng, W. F. Good, and D. Gur, “Knowledge-based computer-aided mass detection on digitized mammograms: A preliminary assessment,” Med. Phys. 28, 455–461 (2001).
29.T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, New York, 1991).
30.J. V. Hajnal, D. L. G. Hill, and D. J. Hawkes, Medical Image Registration (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2000).
31.M. Heath et al., “Current status of the digital database for screening mammography,” in Digital Mammography (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1998).
32.W. Li, “Mutual information functions versus correlation functions,” J. Stat. Phys. 60, 823–837 (1990).
33.W. M. Wells, P. V. Viola, H. Atsumi, S. Nakajima, and R. Kikinis, “Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information,” Med. Image Anal 1, 35–51 (1996).
34.F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, “Multimodal image registration by maximization of mutual information,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 187–198 (1997).
35.A. Treves and A. Panzeri, “The upward bias in measures of information derived from limited data samples,” Neural Comput. 7, 399–407 (1995).
36.G. D. Tourassi, E. D. Frederick, M. K. Markey, and C. E. Floyd, Jr., “Application of the mutual information criterion for feature selection in computer-aided diagnosis,” Med. Phys. 28, 2394–2402 (2001).
37.B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, edited by D. R. Cox et al. (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1993).
38.G. M. teBrake, N. Karssemeijer, and J. H. Hendricks, “An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 2843–2857 (2000).
39.W. A. Berg, C. Campassi, P. Langenberg, and M. J. Sexton, “Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 174, 1769–1777 (2000).
Article metrics loading...