1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: Pilot study
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.1796171
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/31/10/10.1118/1.1796171
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/31/10/10.1118/1.1796171

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

An example of the comparison of (left-right), (anterior-posterior), and (superior-inferior) coordinates of supine (solid line) and prone (dashed line) colon centerlines as functions of distance from the anus.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

An example of 3D view of prone (1) and supine (2) colon images, from one patient, segmented using fixed intensity threshold at .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

An example of the distribution of LEPs along the axis for both prone and supine paths. LEPs are obtained by numerical differentiation following Gaussian smoothing.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Pseudo code that recursively matches LEPs for one axis. RL is the “recursion limit.” Initially, the function is called with . Since the arrays are passed between recursion levels by address, their contents can be modified and stored during recursion. At every recursion level, is updated and passed into the next recursion as an input parameter. The final value of is the output of this routine.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(1), (2), and (3) are frequency histograms of variable , variable , and variable , respectively, using 120 landmarks [for (1) and (2)] and 26 matched polyp pairs [for (3)]. Each subfigure gives the corresponding maximum likelihood fit (solid curves) for a half normal distribution. The two dashed lines above and below the fitted curve are the 95% bootstrap interval.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Illustration of the dynamic programming scheme for solving the optimal matching of S set (with ordered elements) and P set (with ordered elements). Suppose for cases (0)–(4) elements included in a polygon are optimally matched, i.e., the sum of the matching scores is maximized. When the strict ordering is preserved, the optimal matching for case (0) can only be one of the three cases (1)–(3), i.e., whichever case that has the largest total score. Case (4) is proposed when the strict ordering condition is slightly relaxed by allowing cross matching the two pairs of neighboring elements. Therefore, if the optimal solutions for the structures included in the polygons in cases (1)–(4) can be found, the optimal solution for case (0) is equal to one of the cases (1)–(4) that produces the largest sum of match scores.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Average (over 24 patients) mean misalignment distance vs number of iterations at five different recursion limits. Note provided the smallest misalignment over the widest number of iterations.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

An example showing the coordinates vs path distance, to illustrate the pre- and postregistration correspondence between supine and prone paths.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Unregistered, base line-adjusted, and registered mean misalignment distances for all 24 cases.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Descriptions of the symbols used in representing the polyp registration results in Tables II–IV.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Results for matching only the polyps listed in the reference standard, using the polyp registration algorithm. The cases are numbered the same as in Fig. 9.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Results for applying the polyp registration algorithm to match the top 30 CAD hits from prone and supine data sets.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

The average number of CAD hits per polyp in one of the two scans that would need to be viewed to match its correct counterpart in the other. Results are presented for sorting the CAD hits by polyp match scores and for sorting the hits by relative path distance.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Cases with missing colonic segments due to locally poor distension and/or cleansing. : length of missing colon segment(s); : total path length; MMD: mean misalignment distance following path registration. The cases are numbered the same as in Fig. 9.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/31/10/10.1118/1.1796171
2004-10-01
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: Pilot study
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/31/10/10.1118/1.1796171
10.1118/1.1796171
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM