Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. II. Finite number of secondaries and structured backgrounds
1.H. H. Barrett, “Objective assessment of image quality: Effects of quantum noise and object variability,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1266–1278 (1990).
2.H. H. Barrett, J. L. Denny, R. F. Wagner, and K. J. Myers, “Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 834–852 (1995).
3.H. H. Barrett, C. K. Abbey, and E. Clarkson, “Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 1520–1534 (1998).
4.H. H. Barrett and K. J. Myers, Foundations of Image Science (Wiley, New York, 2004).
5.R. F. Wagner and D. G. Brown, “Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems,” Phys. Med. Biol. 30, 489–518 (1985).
6.A. R. Pineda and H. H. Barrett, “Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring,” Med. Phys. 31, 348–358 (2004).
7.A. E. Burgess, F. L. Jacobson, and P. F. Judy, “Lesion detection in digital mammograms,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 555–560 (2001).
8.K. J. Myers, J. P. Rolland, H. H. Barrett, and R. F. Wagner, “Aperture optimization for emission imaging: Effect of a spatially varying background,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1279–1293 (1990).
9.J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett, “Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649–658 (1992).
10.M. Albert and D. A. Maidment, “Linear response theory for detectors consisting of discrete arrays,” Med. Phys. 27, 2417–2434 (2000).
11.J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography),” Med. Phys. 27, 1903–1914 (2000).
12.A. R. Pineda and H. H. Barrett, “What does DQE say about lesion detectability in digital radiography?” Proc. SPIE 4320, 561–569 (2001).
13.R. M. Gagne, J. S. Boswell, K. J. Myers, and G. Peter, “Signal detectability in digital radiography,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 316–325 (2001).
14.H. H. Barrett, J. Yao, J. Rolland, and K. J. Myers, “Model observers for assessment of image quality,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 9758–9765 (1993).
15.E. Clarkson, A. R. Pineda, and H. H. Barrett, “An analytical approximation to the Hotelling trace for digital x-ray detectors,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 339–349 (2001).
16.I. Cunningham, “Applied linear systems theory,” Physics and Psychophysics, Handbook of Medical Imaging Vol. 1, edited by J. Beutel, H. L. Kundell, and R. L. Van Metter (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2000).
17.J. T. Dobbins, “Image quality metrics for digital systems,” in Ref. 16.
18.H. H. Barrett, K. J. Myers, B. Gallas, E. Clarkson, and H. Zhang, “Megalopinakophobia: Its symptoms and cures,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 299–307 (2001).
19.H. H. Barrett, R. F. Wagner, and K. J. Myers, “Correlated point processes in radiological imaging,” Proc. SPIE 3032, 110–124 (1997).
20.J. P. Rolland, “Factors influencing lesion detection in medical imaging,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1990.
21.A. Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1991).
22.S. L. Lawrence, Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987).
23.A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, and J. R. Buck, Discrete-Time Signal Processing (Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998).
Article metrics loading...