Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Simultaneous minimizing monitor units and number of segments without leaf end abutment for segmental intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery
1.T. R. Bortfeld, D. L. Kahler, T. J. Waldron, and A. L. Boyer, “X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 28, 723–730 (1994).
2.D. J. Convery and M. E. Rosenbloom, “The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 37, 1359–1374 (1992).
3.S. M. Crooks, L. F. McAven, D. F. Robinson, and L. Xing, “Minimizing delivery time and monitor units in static IMRT by leaf-sequencing,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3105–3116 (2002).
4.J. Dai and Y. Zhu, “Minimizing the number of segments in a delivery sequence for intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a multileaf collimator,” Med. Phys. 28, 2113–2120 (2001).
5.M. L. Dirkx, B. J. Heijmen, and J. P. van Santvoort, “Leaf trajectory calculation for dynamic multileaf collimation to realize optimized fluence profiles,” Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 1171–1184 (1998).
6.J. M. Galvin, X. G. Chen, and R. M. Smith, “Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 27, 697–705 (1993).
7.S. Kamath, S. Sahni, J. Li, J. Palta, and S. Ranka, “Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 307–324 (2003).
8.M. Langer, V. Thai, and L. Papiez, “Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators,” Med. Phys. 28, 2450–2458 (2001).
9.L. Ma, A. L. Boyer, C. M. Ma, and L. Xing, “Synchronizing dynamic multileaf collimators for producing two-dimensional intensity-modulated fields with minimum beam delivery time,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 44, 1147–1154 (1999).
10.L. Ma, “Smoothing intensity-modulated treatment delivery under hard-ware constraints,” Med. Phys. 29, 2937–2945 (2002).
11.W. Que, “Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field seg-mentation,” Med. Phys. 26, 2390–2396 (1999).
12.R. A. Siochi, “Minimizing static intensity modulation delivery time using an intensity solid paradigm,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 43, 671–680 (1999).
13.S. V. Spirou and C. S. Chui, “Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by combining the scanning beam with dynamic multileaf collimation,” Med. Phys. 23, 1–8 (1996).
14.J. P. van Santvoort and B. J. Heijmen, “Dynamic multileaf collimation without ‘tongue-and-groove’ underdosage effects,” Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 2091–2105 (1996).
15.S. Webb, “Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator,” Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 241–260 (1998).
16.P. Xia and L. J. Verhey, “Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments,” Med. Phys. 25, 1424–1434 (1998).
17.L. Ma, N. Phaisangittisakul, C. Yu, and M. Sarfaraz, “A quality assurance method for analyzing and verifiying intensity modulated fields,” Med. Phys. (in press).
18.N. Agazaryan and T. Solberg, “Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator,” Med. Phys. 30, 1758–1767 (2003).
Article metrics loading...