No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Calculation and validation of the use of effective attenuation coefficient for attenuation correction in In-111 SPECT
1.D. R. Gilland, R. J. Jaszczak, T. G. Turkington, K. L. Greer, and R. E. Coleman, “Quantitative SPECT imaging with indium-111,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 761–766 (1991).
2.M. S. Kaplan et al., “Scatter and attenuation correction for 111In based on energy spectrum fitting,” Med. Phys. 23, 1277–1285 (1996).
3.M. Wilk, I. Yuzefovich, R. Carmi, and Y. Shrem, “Practical multi-peak attenuation correction with CT data,” J. Nucl. Med. 43(suppl 5), 221 (2002).
5.H. R. Tang et al., in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium/Medical Imaging Conference (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1998), Vol. 46, pp. 551–557.
6.P. E. Kinahan, B. H. Hasegawa, and T. Beyer, “X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners,” Semin Nucl. Med. 33, 166–179 (2003).
8.Y. Seo et al., “Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 868–877 (2005).
9.K. H. Wong, H. R. Tang, G. Segall, and B. H. Hasegawa, “Development of quantitative imaging methods for the GE Hawkeye CT/SPECT system,” Conference Record of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 4, 2170–2173 (2002).
10.K. H. Wong, Multi-Modality Imaging for Improved Staging of Prostate Cancer, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, 2002.
11.M. Bocher et al., “Gamma camera-mounted anatomical x-ray tomography: Technology, system characteristics and first images,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 619–627 (2000).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month