1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effects of x-ray and CT image enhancements on the robustness and accuracy of a rigid 3D/2D image registration
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.1869592
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/32/4/10.1118/1.1869592
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/32/4/10.1118/1.1869592

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

X-ray imaging system geometry and coordinate systems. The coordinate systems are the image 1 and image 2 origin coordinate systems ( and ), the x-ray source 1 and source 2 coordinate systems ( and ), and the CT origin and linac isocenter coordinate systems ( and ).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

3D texturemap based chest phantom projection images using (a) over operator and (b) attenuate operator.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Illustration for the 3D texturemap based DRR generation. The intersections of the proxy slices ( dotted rectangles ) and the CT image are projected and blended.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

X-ray image preprocessing results: (a) window-level; (b) histogram equalization; and (c) adaptive histogram equalization.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

CT image preprocessing methods and DRR images. (a) Histogram and three sets of window-level ranges: (ALTB), (TB), and bone (B), (b)–(d) the result slice images, and (e)–(g) the DRR images.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

MI profiles of the nine combinations of CT and x-ray enhancement methods. In each plot, the top three and bottom three graph graphs are the rotation and translation profiles, respectively (The translation profiles are shifted down for clarity). The axes are the shifts in mm and deg, and the axes are the MI values.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Registration grid plots for the ALTB-WL and ALTB-AHE combinations. The axes are the initial offset errors (mm for translations, deg for rotations), and the axes are the error dimensions. Each symbol is one registration trial with a dot “●” indicating that the initial error was successfully corrected, and an “” indicates that it failed.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Attraction ranges of the six enhancement combinations.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

(a) the MI profile of the B-WL combination and (b) the normalized DRR and x-ray histograms at and .

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Gradient ascent maximization parameters for the three search phases. is the total number of iterations, is the initial step size matrix, and is the initial learning rate matrix.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Error means and standard deviations of the successful registrations (the dot symbols in the registration grid plots).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/32/4/10.1118/1.1869592
2005-03-16
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Effects of x-ray and CT image enhancements on the robustness and accuracy of a rigid 3D/2D image registration
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/32/4/10.1118/1.1869592
10.1118/1.1869592
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM