banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
T1 measurement using a short acquisition period for quantitative cardiac applications
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic timing diagram of the SAP-T1 pulse sequence. The first five measurements are shown, in which all data for one slice are acquired. The slice acquisition is repeated with four different preparation pulse delays (PD) and also without the 90° preparation pulse (equivalent to ). This set of measurements is repeated with different trigger delays (TD) which are unique for each slice. : slice selection gradient, : phase encoding gradient, : frequency encoding gradient.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Plots of theoretical calculation of the -magnetization evolution for various preparation pulse delays for a T1 value of . The 12th pulses which acquire the lines are indicated with a black dot. The time from the center of the preparation pulse to the line is the PD. The calculation takes account of the flip angle sweep during the first 12 rf pulses as described in the text. (b) Each point from (a) is normalized here to a theoretical calculation of the measurement. This measurement is not a “true” measurement of the fully relaxed magnetization because it also is affected by the multiple readout pulses and also approaches a steady state. For this reason the points on the graph associated with the filling of the lines, when fitted to a monoexponential function, do not exactly trace the theoretical monoexponential T1 recovery line (also plotted). This is seen more clearly in the enlarged portion. Use of in Eq. (4) allows the fitted curve to move along the axis. The concave shapes of the dotted lines are a consequence of the normalization process.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Accuracy of the T1 relaxation rate of IR-SE (used for T1 reference values) and the SAP-T1 sequence for one of the three slices (slice 3), in a phantom containing a range of concentrations of Gd-DTPA expected to be found in the myocardium during the first-pass of Gd-DTPA in a myocardial perfusion study. Graphs for slices 2 and 1 are similar (not shown). (b) The linearity of relaxation rate of IR-SE (squares, used for T1 reference values) and the SAP-T1 method using the sequence (triangles) with the concentration of Gd-DTPA for slice 3 (in vitro). Graphs for slices 2 and 1 are similar (not shown). The concentration of Gd-DTPA in the myocardium during a first-pass study is typically less than . The maximum 6% error in T1 using SAP-T1 translates to a maximum error in Gd-DTPA concentration estimation of 4.5%, for ( Gd-DTPA).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) In vitro T1 pixel map of Gd-DTPA-doped agarose gel phantoms using SAP-T1 with . (b) Example in vivo source image (mid-short-axis slice, , ), from patient 1. (c) In vivo SAP-T1 map from patient 1, precontrast. (d) In vivo SAP-T1 map from patient 1, postcontrast. (e) In vivo SAP-T1 map from patient 2, precontrast. (e) In vivo SAP-T1 map from patient 2, postcontrast.


Generic image for table

The 15 single heartbeat measurements required to obtain a full data set (four points on the recovery curve for three slices). Note that the trigger delays remain unaltered for each slice. The measurements may be made in a single breath hold if the measurements are set as measurements 1–3. The order thereafter is not significant.

Generic image for table

T1 relaxation times estimated by SAP-T1 technique in vitro for three slices compared with reference values obtained using a multiple-point IR-SE technique.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: T1 measurement using a short acquisition period for quantitative cardiac applications