No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system
1.U. Missler, C. Hundt, M. Wiesmann, T. Mayer, and H. Brackmann, “Three-dimensional reconstructed rotational digital subtraction angiography in planning treatment of intracranial aneurysms,” Eur. Radiol. 4, 564–568 (2000).
2.A. Hochmuth, U. Spetzger, and M. Schumacher, “Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 23, 1199–1205 (2002).
3.J. K. Song, Y. Niimi, J. L. Brisman, and A. Berenstein, “Simultaneous bilateral internal carotid artery 3D rotational angiography,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 25, 1787–1789 (2004).
4.D. A. Jaffray, J. H. Siewerdsen, and D. G. Drake, “Performance of a volumetric CT scanner based upon a flat-panel imager,” Proc. SPIE 3659, 204–214 (1999).
6.G. Rose, J. Wiegert, D. Schaefer, K. Fiedler, N. Conrads, J. Timmer, V. Rasche, N. Noordhoek, E. Klotz, and R. Koppe, “Image quality of flat-panel cone beam CT,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 677–684 (2003).
7.J. Wiegert, M. Bertram, D. Schaefer, N. Conrads, N. Noordhoek, K. de Jong, T. Aach, and G. Rose, “Soft-tissue contrast resolution within the head of human cadaver by means of flat-detector-based cone-beam CT,” Proc. SPIE 5368, 330–337 (2004).
8.R. Fahrig, A. Ganguly, J. D. Starman, and N. K. Strobel, “C-arm CT with XRIIs and digital flat panels: a review.” Proc. SPIE 5535, 400–410 (2004).
9.H. Arakawa, M. P. Marks, H. M. Do, N. Strobel, and R. Fahrig, “Experimental study of intracranial hematoma detection with flat panel detector C-arm CT,” Joint Annual Meeting of the AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section and The American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Orlando, Florida, 2006, p. 71.
10.D. L. Miller et al., “Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study: Part I: Overall measures of dose,” J. Vasc. Interv Radiol. 14, 711–722 (2003).
11.D. L. Miller et al., “Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study: Part II: Skin Dose,” J. Vasc. Interv Radiol. 14, 977–990 (2003).
12.S. Balter et al., “Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study: Part III: Dosimetric performance of the interventional fluoroscopy units,” J. Vasc. Interv Radiol. 15, 919–926 (2004).
13.B. A. Schueler, D. F. Kallmes, and H. J. Cloft, “3D cerebral angiography: Radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 26, 1898–1901 (2005).
14.J. N. Kroon, “3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 341–349 (2005).
15.R. Fahrig, R. Dixon, J. T. Payne, R. Morin, A. Ganguly, and N. Strobel, “Characterization of dose distribution and image quality in 3D volume images reconstructed from data acquired on a flat-panel-based C-arm angiography system.” RSNA, SSC16–09, Chicago (RSNA, Oak Brook, IL, 2005).
17.J. A. Anderson, T. Dallas, D. P. Chason, T. J. Lane, and A. L. McAnulty, “CT dosimetry and the new modalities: Cone-beam and wide area CT,” RSNA 2004, Chicago (RSNA, Oak Brook, IL, 2004), p. 735.
18.C. Suess, W. A. Kalender, and J. M. Coman, “New low-contrast resolution phantoms for computed tomography,” Med. Phys. 26, 296–302 (1999).
19.T. Ishida, S. Tsukagoshi, K. Kondo, K. Kainuma, M. Okumura, and T. Sasaki, “Evaluation of dose efficiency index compared to receiver operating characteristics for assessing CT low-contrast performance,” Proc. SPIE 5368, 527–533 (2004).
20.M. Spahn, “Flat detectors and their clinical applications,” Eur. Radiol. 15, 1934–1947 (2005).
21.M. Gies, W. A. Kalender, H. Wolf, C. Suess, and M. T. Madsen, “Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies,” Med. Phys. 26, 2235–2247 (1999).
22.R. Fahrig and D. W. Holdsworth, “Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: image-based correction of gantry motion nonidealities,” Med. Phys. 27, 30–38 (2000).
23.L. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1, 612–619 (1984).
24.K. Wiesent, K. Barth, N. Navab, P. Durlak, T. Brunner, O. Schuetz, and W. Seissler, “Enhanced 3-D-reconstruction algorithm for C-arm systems suitable for interventional procedures,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 391–403 (2000).
25.M. Zellerhoff, B. Scholz, E. P. Ruehrnschopf, and T. Brunner, “Low contrast 3D reconstruction from C-arm data,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 646–655 (2005).
27.K. M. Hanson, “Noise and contrast discrimination in computed tomography,” in: Technical Aspects of Computed Tomography Vol. 5, edited by D. G. Newton THaP (C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, 1981).
28.A. E. Burgess, “The Rose model, revisited,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 16, 633–646 (1999).
30.W. Huda, K. A. Lieberman, J. Chang, and M. L. Roskopf, “Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality,” Med. Phys. 31, 595–601 (2004).
31.M. A. Staniszewska, M. Obrzut, and K. Rybka, “Phantom studies for possible dose reduction in CT head procedures,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 326–331 (2005).
32.R. Ning, B. Chen, R. Yu, D. Conover, X. Tang, and Y. Ning, “Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 949–963 (2000).
33.European Commission, “Quality criteria for computed tomography: working document,” Publication EUR 16262 (European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 1997).
34.J. E. Gray, B. R. Archer, P. F. Butler, B. B. Hobbs, F. A. Mettler, Jr., R. J. Pizzutiello, Jr., B. A. Schueler, K. J. Strauss, O. H. Suleiman, and M. J. Yaffe, “The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group on Reference Values for Diagnostic XrE. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact,” Radiology 235, 354–358 (2005).
35.D. Platten, N. Keat, M. Lewis, J. Barrett, and S. Edyvean, “Siemens Sensation 16 CT Scanner Technical Evaluation,” Evaluation Report 04037: ImPACT-MHRA, 2004.
36.W. A. Kalender, H. Wolf, and C. Suess, “Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements,” Med. Phys. 26, 2248–2253 (1999).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month