No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Optimization of a tomosynthesis system for the detection of lung nodules
1.J. Dobbins, Image Quality Metrics for Digital Systems, J. Beutel, H. L. Kundel, and R. L. Van Metter, in Handbook of Medical Imaging, edited by (SPIE—The International Society of Optical Engineering, Bellingham, 2000).
2.J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography),” Med. Phys. 27, 1903–1914 (2000).
3.A. Ganguly, S. Rudin, D. R. Bednarek, K. R. Hoffmann, and I. S. Kyprianou, “Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. I. Experimental evaluation and feasibility,” Med. Phys. 30, 3018–3028 (2003).
4.H. H. Barrett, “Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 7, 1266–1278 (1990).
5.M. P. Eckstein, J. L. Bartroff, C. K. Abbey, J. S. Whiting, and F. O. Bochud, “Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks,” Opt. Express 11, 460–475 (2003).
6.Y. I. Zhang, B. T. Pham, and M. P. Eckstein, “Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in x-ray coronary angiograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 459–474 (2004).
7.R. M. Gagne, J. S. Boswell, and K. J. Myers, “Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit,” Med. Phys. 30, 2180–2193 (2003).
8.K. M. Hanson, “Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 7, 1294–1304 (1990).
9.S. Suryanarayanan et al., “Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography,” Acad. Radiol. 8, 219–224 (2001).
10.H. H. Barrett and K. J. Myers, Foundations of Image Science (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004).
11.E. G. Solomon, M. S. Van Lysel, R. E. Melen, J. W. Moorman, and B. Skillicorn, Low-exposure scanning-beam x-ray fluoroscopy system, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Medical Imaging 1996, Physics of Medical Imaging, 11–13 Feb. 1996, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 1996, Vol. 2708, pp. 140–149.
12.E. G. Solomon, B. P. Wilfley, M. S. Van Lysel, A. W. Joseph, and J. A. Heanue, Scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) system for cardiac angiography, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Proceedings of the 1999 Medical Imaging—Physics of Medical Imaging, 21–23 Feb. 1999, San Diego, CA, USA, 1999, Vol. 3659, pp. 246–257.
13.R. Fahrig, G. M. Stevens, E. G. Solomon, and N. J. Pelc, “On the feasibility of using the scanning-beam digital x-ray system (SBDX) for lung nodule screening,” in 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, edited by J. Enderle (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2000), Vol. 1653, pp. 1652–1655.
14.E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, and W. R. Eyler, “Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs,” Radiology 213, 727–734 (1999).
15.H. H. Barrett, C. K. Abbey, and E. Clarkson, “Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 15, 1520–1535 (1998).
16.R. Fahrig, A. R. Pineda, E. G. Solomon, A. N. Leung, and N. J. Pelc, Fast tomosynthesis for lung cancer detection using the SBDX geometry, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Medical Imaging 2003, Physics of Medical Imaging, 16–18 Feb. 2003, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, Vol. 5030, pp. 371–378.
17.C. Karadi, C. F. Beaulieu, R. B. Jeffrey, D. S. Paik, and S. Napel, “Display modes for CT colonography: Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data,” Radiology 212, 195–201 (1999).
18.S. Yoon, A. R. Pineda, E. G. Solomon, J. Star-lack, and R. Fahrig, A fast and accurate tomosynthesis simulation model, IEEE Medical Imaging Conference (MIC), Rome, 2004.
19.A. E. Burgess, “Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods,” Med. Phys. 22, 643–655 (1995).
20.C. K. Abbey, H. H. Barrett, and M. P. Eckstein, Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Medical Imaging 1997: Physics of Medical Imaging, 23–25 Feb. 1997, San Jose, CA, USA, 1997, Vol. 3032, pp. 182–194.
21.K. J. Myers and H. H. Barrett, “Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 4, 2447–2457 (1987).
22.A. E. Burgess, “Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 11, 1237–1242 (1994).
23.M. P. Eckstein and J. S. Whiting, “Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 13, 1777–1787 (1996).
24.G. M. Stevens, R. Fahrig, and N. J. Pelc, “Filtered backprojection for modifying the impulse response of circular tomosynthesis,” Med. Phys. 28, 372–380 (2001).
25.T. Wu et al., “Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images,” Med. Phys. 30, 365–380 (2003).
26.D. J. Godfrey and J. T. Dobbins, “Optimization of matrix inversion tomosynthesis via impulse response simulations,” Radiology 225, 545–546 (2002).
27.D. J. Godfrey, R. J. Warp, and J. T. Dobbin III, Optimization of matrix inverse tomosynthesis, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering Medical Imaging 2001, Physics of Medical Imaging, 18–20 Feb. 2001; San Diego, CA, United States, 2001, Vol. 4320, pp. 696–704.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month