No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density
1.Byrne, C. , Schairer, C. , Wolfe, J. , Parekh, N. , Salane, M. , Brinton, L. A. , Hoover, R. , and Haile, R. , “Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87(21), 1622–9 (1995).
2.Boyd, N. F. , Byng, J. W. , Jong, R. A. , Fishell, E. K. , Little, L. E. , Miller, A. B. , Lockwood, G. A. , Tritchler, D. L. , and Yaffe, M. J. , “Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87(9), 670–675 (1995).
3.Saftlas, A. F. , Wolfe, J. N. , Hoover, R. N. , Brinton, L. A. , Schairer, C. , Salane, M. , and Szklo, M , “Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk,” Am. J. Epidemiol. 129(3), 518–526 (1989).
4.Boyd, N. F. , Lockwood, G. A. , Martin, L. J. , Knight, J. A. , Jong, R. A. , Fishell, E. , Byng, J. W. , Yaffe, M. J. , and Tritchler, D. L. , “Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(16), 1404–1408 (1999).
5.Wolfe, J. N. , Saftlas, A. F. , and Salane, M. , “Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: A case-control study,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 148(6), 1087–1092 (1987).
6.Saftlas, A. F. , and Szklo, M. , “Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk,” Epidemiol. Rev. 9:146–174 (1987).
7.Boyd, N. F. , Jensen, H. M. , Cooke, G. , Han, H. L. , Lockwood, G. A. , and Miller, A. B. , “Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study,” Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 9(1), 15–24 (2000).
8.Ziv, E. , Tice, J. , Smith-Bindman, R. , Shepherd, J. , Cummings, S. , and Kerlikowske, K , “Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.” Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 13(12), 2090–2095 (2004).
9.Struewing, J. P. , Hartge, P. , Wacholder, S. , Baker, S. M. , Berlin, M. , McAdams, M. , Timmerman, M. M. , Brody, L. C. , and Tucker, M. A. , “The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews,” N. Engl. J. Med. 336(20), 1401–1408 (1997).
10.Byng, J. , Boyd, N. , Fishell, E. , John, R. , and Yaffe, M. , “The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 1629–1638 (1994).
11.Wolfe, J. N. , “Breast, patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 126(6), 1130–1137 (1976).
12.van Gils, C. H. , Otten, J. D. , Verbeek, A. L. , and Hendriks, J. H. , “Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?,” Eur. J. Epidemiol. 14(4), 315–320 (1998).
13.Boyd, N. F. , O’Sullivan, B. , Campbell, JE. , Fishell, E. , Simor, I. , Cooke, G. , and Germanson, T. , “Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer,” Br. J. Cancer 45(2), 185–193 (1982).
14.Brisson, J. , Merletti, F. , Sadowsky, N. L. , Twaddle, J. A. , Morrison, A. S. , and Cole, P. , “Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk,” Am. J. Epidemiol. 115(3), 428–437 (1982).
15.Sivaramakrishna, R. , Obuchowski, N. A. , Chilcote, W. A. , and Powell, K. A. , “Automatic segmentation of mammographic density,” Acad. Radiol. 8(3), 250–256 (2001).
16.Chow, C. K. , Venzon, D. , Jones, E. C. , Premkumar, A. , O’Shaughnessy, J. , and Zujewski, J. , “Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density,” Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 9(9), 917–921 (2000).
17.Cuzick, J. , Warwick, J. , Pinney, E. , Warren, R. M. , and Duffy, S. W. , “Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96(8), 621–628 (2004).
18.Laskey, M. , and Phil, D. , “Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and body composition,” Nutrition 12(1), 45–51 (1996).
19.Bertin, E. , Ruiz, J. C. , Mourot, J. , Peiniau, P. , and Portha, B. , “Evaluation of dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry for body-composition assessment in rats,” J. Nutr. 128(9), 1550–1554 (1998).
20.Shepherd, J. A. , Kerlikowske, K. M. , Smith-Bindman, R. , Genant, H. K. , and Cummings, S. R , “Measurement of breast density with dual x-ray absorptiometry: Feasibility,” Radiology 223(2), 554–557 (2002).
21.Ballard-Barbash, R. , Taplin, S. H. , Yankaskas, B. C. , Ernster, V. L. , Rosenberg, R. D. , Carney, P. A. , Barlow, W. E. , Geller, B. M. , Kerlikowske, K. , Edwards, B. K. , Lynch, C. F. , Urban, N. , Chrvala, C. A. , Key, C. R. , Poplack, S. P. , Worden, J. K. , and Kessler, L. G. , “Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 169(4), 1001–1018 (1997).
22.Prevrhal, S. , Shepherd, J. A. , Smith-Bindman, R. , Cummings, S. R. , and Kerlikowske, K. , “Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: Results of formal operator training,” Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 11(11), 1389–1393 (2002).
23.Tylavsky, F. , Lohman, T. , Blunt, B. A. , Schoeller, D. A. , Fuerst, T. , Cauley, J. A. , Nevitt, M. C. , Visser, M. , and Harris, T. B. , “QDR 4500A DXA overestimates fat-free mass compared with criterion methods,” J. Appl. Physiol. 94(3), 959–965 (2003).
24.Schoeller, D. A. , Tylavsky, F. A. , Baer, D. J. , Chumlea, W. C. , Earthman, C. P. , Fuerst, T. , Harris, T. B. , Heymsfield, S. B. , Horlick, M. , Lohman, T. G. , Lukaski, H. C. , Shepherd, J. , Siervogel, R. M. , and Borrud, L. G. , “QDR 4500A dual-energy x-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults,” Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81(5), 1018–1025 (2005).
25.Hammerstein, G. R. , Miller, D. W. , White, D. R. , Masterson, M. E. , Woodard, H. Q. , and Laughlin, J. S. , “Absorbed radiation dose in mammography,” Radiother. Oncol. 130(2), 485–491 (1979).
26.Blake, G. M. , Wahner, H. W. , and Fogelman, I. , The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Ultrasound in Clinical Practice, 2nd ed. (Martin Dunitz, London, 1999).
27.Kerlikowske, K. , Shepherd, J. , Creasman, J. , Tice, J. A. , Ziv, E. , and Cummings, S. R. , “Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97(5), 368–374 (2005).
28.Pawluczyk, O. , Augustine, B. J. , Yaffe, M. J. , Rico, D. , Yang, J. , Mawdsley, G. E. , and Boyd, N. F. , “A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.” Med. Phys. 30(3), 352–364 (2003).
29.van Engeland, S. , Snoeren, P. R. , Huisman, H. , Boetes, C. , and Karssemeijer, N. , “Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(3), 273–282 (2006).
30.Highnam, R. P. , Brady, J. M. , and Shepstone, B. J. , “Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.” Br. J. Radiol. 71(846), 646–653 (1998).
31.Marias, K. , Behrenbruch, C. , Highnam, R. , Parbhoo, S. , Seifalian, A. , and Brady, M. , “A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.” Eur. J. Radiol. 52(3), 276–282 (2004).
32.Heine, J. J. , Malhotra, P. , “Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences.” Acad. Radiol.. 9(3), 317–335 (2002).
33.Stone, J. , Gunasekara, A. , Martin, L. J. , Yaffe, M. , Minkin, S. , and Boyd, N. F. , “The Detection of Change in Mammographic Density.” Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 12(7), 625–630 (2003).
34.Harvey, J. A. , “Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: Analog versus digital acquisition.” Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 3(6), 611–616 (2004).
35.Gluer, C. C. , Blake, G. , Lu, Y. , Blunt, B. A. , Jergas, M. , and Genant, H. K. , “Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.” Osteoporosis Int. 5(4), 262–270 (1995).
37.1989 ICRU Report 44, “Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement, international Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Inc., Bethesda, MD.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month