1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A prototype table-top inverse-geometry volumetric CT system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2192887
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/6/10.1118/1.2192887
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/6/10.1118/1.2192887

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Proposed IGCT geometry shown with the x-ray beam at one position in the source array.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) The prototype table-top IGCT scanner. The prototype system source is larger than the detector in both dimensions. A subset of the source array (b) was used for all experiments, except for the noise experiments where (c) of the source were used.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) The 2D parallel-ray geometry to which the IGCT data are rebinned is illustrated using a virtual detector. is the projection view angle, is the tilt angle, and and are the coordinates within the projection. For comparison, two virtual detectors are shown, one with equal to and one with a smaller value of . (b) The four geometry parameters shown for a ray in the IGCT geometry where is the azimuthal angle. The view angle, , is equal to the sum of the azimuthal angle and the gantry rotation angle.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The defined coordinate system in (a) image space and (b) frequency space labeled with the investigated MTF profiles.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

A comparison of the theoretical, simulated, and measured in-plane MTF curves.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

A comparison of the theoretical and simulated slice MTF curves and the measured MTF which is slanted from the axis.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

A coronal image of the Defrise phantom acquired by (a) the IGCT system and (b) the GE eXplore RS micro CT system. Significant cone-beam artifacts can be seen in the micro CT reconstruction.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Axial images of an inner ear specimen acquired by (a)–(c) the IGCT system and (d)–(f) a 16-slice scanner. Images were reconstructed with a standard kernel.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Axial images of two inner ear specimens acquired by (a) the IGCT system and (b) an eight-slice scanner. Both images were reconstructed with a bone-detail kernel.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

The IGCT geometry with a misaligned axis of rotation depicted as a dashed line. The parameters , , , and define the location and orientation of the axis. The misalignment is exaggerated in this drawing.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Prototype IGCT system specifications.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Experimental setup (unless otherwise specified).

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Reconstruction algorithm parameters (unless otherwise specified).

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Results of noise investigation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/6/10.1118/1.2192887
2006-05-26
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A prototype table-top inverse-geometry volumetric CT system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/6/10.1118/1.2192887
10.1118/1.2192887
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM