1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2198198
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/8/10.1118/1.2198198
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/8/10.1118/1.2198198

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

SBDX geometry, on right, compared to a conventional wide-beam system with large detector (image intensifier or flat panel). With SBDX only a small volume is irradiated at any instant, and the scatter generated has low probability of striking the detector. The inverse geometry spreads source x-rays over a larger area at the patient entrance.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Comparison of x-ray beam solid angle, anode geometry, electron beam spatial distribution, and exposure time for a point fixed to the anode.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Comparison of target self-filtration. A reflective anode source uses x-rays emerging at a right angle to the electron beam. SBDX uses x-rays transmitted through the thin tungsten target and substrate layers.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Isocentric imaging geometries. Noise equivalent quanta and entrance exposure were evaluated with acrylic phantoms, each positioned with midplane at mechanical isocenter. To measure contrast, a disk tray was inserted into a small gap created at the midplane (not shown). The scatter fraction was measured with a lead beam-stop array at the phantom entrance and the disk removed (tray still in place).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Off-focus radiation emerging from collimator holes adjacent to the targeted hole. The SBDX geometry is exaggerated in this figure. (b) Measuring the magnitude of off-focus radiation vs the distance from the focal spot. (c) An “image” of the off-focus radiation relative to the focal spot position. To facilitate display, the central pixel is clipped and the remaining values are logged.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

SBDX contrast measured with the 1-mm deep disk ( iodine equivalent).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

SBDX zero-frequency NEQ expressed in units of equivalent quanta per at mechanical isocenter.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Measured large-area iodine SNR of the II/CCD system (open squares) and the SBDX prototype (solid curves, for 70, 80, 90,100, 110, and operation). Open circles represent SBDX operating at the II/CCD system kVp.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Exposure rate at the phantom entrance during measurement of SNR, for the II/CCD system (open squares), SBDX prototype at (closed squares), and SBDX operating at the II/CCD system kVp (open circles).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Measured SBDX zero-frequency DQE, shown versus kVp. Bars indicate the range of measurements across phantom thickness; squares represent the average.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Measured SBDX scatter plus off-focus radiation fraction (SF). Bars indicate the range of measurements across source kVp; squares represent the average.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

(a) SBDX to II/CCD ratios evaluated for equal-kVp imaging of 23.3 to phantoms (: entrance area, 1-SF: scatter degradation factor, DQE: detective quantum efficiency. : geometric detection efficiency or grid primary transmission, entrance exposure-to-fluence conversion factor, : patient transmission, : detected primary contrast). (b) Relative SBDX entrance exposure at equal SNR (RX), measured and modeled.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

(a) SBDX to II/CCD ratios in the modeled relative SNR, for the SBDX prototype operating at equal-kVp and maximum power at each kVp. (: total beam-on time per frame, : x-ray production efficiency, : beam current, : x-ray beam solid angle divided by object-plane field area.) (b) Comparison of measured and modeled relative SBDX SNR.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

SBDX SNR measurements rescaled by to reflect projected design improvements. Circles represent SBDX operating at the II/CCD system kVp.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Selected thin phantoms, used to simulate acrylic phantom attenuation during SBDX DQE measurements.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

II/CCD imaging conditions and measurements of contrast and NEQ.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

SBDX SNR and entrance exposure (also shown as percent of the corresponding II/CCD value) when operating at II/CCD kVp.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Measured SBDX and II/CCD entrance exposure efficiency. Relative SBDX entrance exposure at equal SNR (RX).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/8/10.1118/1.2198198
2006-07-14
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/33/8/10.1118/1.2198198
10.1118/1.2198198
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM