No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry I. Methods and techniques for construction
1.E. L. Nickoloff, A. K. Dutta, and Z. F. Lu, “Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index,” Med. Phys. 30, 395–402 (2003).
2.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Computed Tomography (CT) Equipment, 21 CFR 1020.33 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2002).
3.N. F. Jones, T. W. Palarm, and I. S. Negus, “Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques,” Br. J. Radiol. 74, 920–925 (2001).
4.L. Duggan, H. Warren-Forward, T. Smith, and T. Kron, “Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and TLDs,” Br. J. Radiol. 76, 232–237 (2003).
5.G. Giacco, V. Cannata, C. Furetta, F. Santopietro, and G. Fariello, “On the use of pediatric phantoms in the dose evaluation during computed tomography (CT) thorax examinations,” Med. Phys. 28, 199–204 (2001).
6.M. W. Bower, “A physical anthropomorphic phantom of a one-year-old child with real-time dosimetry,” Dissertation: Nuclear & Radiological Engineering (University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1997).
7.V. Varchena, “Pediatric phantoms,” Pediatr. Radiol. 32, 280–284 (2002).
8.V. Varchena, D. Gubatova, V. Sidorin, and S. Kalnitsky, “Children’s heterogeneous phantoms and their application in roentgenology,” Radiat. Prot. Manage. 49, 77–78 (1993).
9.B. L. Justus, P. Falkenstein, A. L. Huston, M. Plazas, H. Ning, and R. W. Miller, “Gated fiber-optic-coupled detector for in vivo real-time radiation dosimetry,” Appl. Opt. 43, 1663–1668 (2004).
10.R. J. Staton, A. K. Jones, C. Lee, D. E. Hintenlang, M. M. Arreola, J. L. Williams, and W. E. Bolch, “A tomographic physical phantom of the newborn patient with real-time dosimetry II. Scaling factors for calculation of average organ dose in pediatric radiography,” Med. Phys.33, 3283–3289 (2006), following paper.
11.J. C. Nipper, J. L. Williams, and W. E. Bolch, “Creation of two tomographic voxel models of pediatric patients in the first year of life,” Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3143–3164 (2002).
12.A. K. Jones, D. E. Hintenlang, and W. E. Bolch, “Tissue-equivalent materials for construction of tomographic dosimetry phantoms in pediatric radiology,” Med. Phys. 30, 2072–2081 (2003).
13.M. Tressler, “Construction of a newborn dosimetry phantom for measurement of effective dose,” Non-Thesis Project, Nuclear and Radiological Engineering (University of Florida, Gainesville, 1999).
14.R. J. Staton, F. D. Pazik, J. C. Nipper, J. L. Williams, and W. E. Bolch, “A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in pediatric radiology,” Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 805–820 (2003).
15.J. B. Sessions, J. N. Roshau, M. A. Tressler, D. E. Hintenlang, M. M. Arreola, J. L. Williams, and W. E. Bolch, “Comparisons of point and average organ dose within an anthropomorphic physical phantom and a computational model of the newborn patient,” Med. Phys. 29, 1080–1089 (2002).
16.A. K. Jones, F. D. Pazik, D. E. Hintenlang, and W. E. Bolch, “MOSFET dosimeter depth-dose measurements in heterogeneous tissue-equivalent phantoms at diagnostic x-ray energies,” Med. Phys. 32, 3209–3213 (2005).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month