No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Impact of target-to-background ratio, target size, emission scan duration, and activity on physical figures of merit for a 3D LSO-based whole body PET/CT scanner
1.S. S. Fruruie, G. T. Herman, T. K. Narayan, P. E. Kinahan, J. S. Karp, R. M. Lewitt, and S. Matej, “A methodology for testing for statistically significant differences between fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 341–354 (1994).
2.National Electrical Manufacturers Association, NEMA Standards Publication NU-2-2001: Performance Measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs (NEMA, Rosslyn, Virginia, 2001).
3.Y. E. Erdi, S. A. Nehmeh, T. Mulnix, J. Humm, and C. C. Watson, “PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2001 standard,” J. Nucl. Med. 45, 813–821 (2004).
7.C. Lartizien, P. E. Kinahan, and C. Comtat, “Volumetric model and human observer comparison of tumor detection for whole-body PET,” Acad. Radiol. 11, 637–648 (2004).
8.M. Brambilla, C. Secco, M. Dominietto, R. Matheoud, G. Sacchetti, and E. Inglese, “Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 Standard,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 2083–2091 (2005).
9.R. D. Badawi, P. K. Marsden, B. F. Cronin, J. L. Sutcliffe, and M. N. Maisey, “Optimization of noise-equivalent count rates in 3D PET,” Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 1755–1776 (1996).
10.C. C. Watson, M. E. Casey, L. Eriksson, T. Mulnix, D. Adams, and B. Bendriem, “NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity,” J. Nucl. Med. 45, 822–826 (2004).
11.B. S. Halpern et al., “Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 603–607 (2005).
12.C. Riddel, R. E. Carson, J. A. Carrasquillo, S. K. Libutti, D. N. Danforth, M. Whatley, and S. Bacharach, “Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment,” J. Nucl. Med. 42, 1316–1323 (2001).
13.T. H. Farquhar, J. Llacer, J. Sayre, Y. Tai, and E. J. Hoffman, “ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images,” J. Nucl. Med. 41, 745–754 (2000).
15.M. Conti, B. Bendriem, M. Casey, M. Chen, F. Kehren, C. Michel, and V. Panin, “First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 4507–4526 (2005).
16.D. Brasse, P. E. Kinahan, C. Lartizien, C. Comtat, M. Casey, and C. Michel, “Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 859–867 (2005).
17.D. G. Kleinbaum, L. L. Kupper, and K. E. Muller, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods (PWS-KENT, Boston, Massachusetts, 1988).
18.W. L. Hays, Statistics, 4th ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc., 1988).
19.C. C. Watson, M. E. Casey, B. Bendriem, J. P. Carney, D. W. Townsend, S. Eberl, S. Meikle, and S. F. P. DiFilippo, “Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modelling the counting-rate response function specific to individual patient scan,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1825–1834 (2005).
20.J. R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis. The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements (University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 1982).
21.E. J. Hoffman, S. C. Huang, and M. E. Phelps, “Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: effect of object size,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 3, 299–308 (1979).
22.M. Dahlbom, E. J. Hoffmann, C. K. Hoh, C. Schiepers, G. Rosenqvist, R. A. Hawkins, and M. E. Phelps, “Whole-body positron emission tomography: Part I. Methods and performance characteristics,” J. Nucl. Med. 33, 1191–1199 (1992).
23.G. Brix, U. Lechel, G. Glatting, S. I. Ziegler, W. Munzing, S. P. Muller, and T. Beyer, “Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality -FDG PET/CT examinations,” J. Nucl. Med. 46, 608–613 (2005).
24.H. Everaert, C. Vanhove, T. Lahoutte, K. Muylle, V. Caveliers, A. Bossuyt, and P. R. Franken, “Optimal dose of 18F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET camera,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30, 1615–1619 (2003).
25.C. Lartizien, P. E. Kinahan, and C. Comtat, “A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole body PET imaging protocol,” J. Nucl. Med. 45, 714–723 (2004).
26.C. C. Watson, M. E. Casey, T. Beyer, T. Bruckbauer, D. W. Townsend, and D. Brasse, “Evaluation of clinical PET count rate performance,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50, 1379–1385 (2003).
27.P. M. Cheng, P. E. Kinahan, C. Comtat, J. S. Kim, C. Lartizien, and T. K. Lewellen, “Effect of scan duration on lesion detectability in PET oncology imaging,” in 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (IEEE, 2004), 1432–1435.
28.L. Drever, W. Roa, A. McEwan, and D. Robinson, “Iterative threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation,” Med. Phys. 34, 1253–1265 (2007).
29.H. Bergman, G. Dobrozemsky, G. Minear, R. Nicoletti, and M. Samal, “An inter-laboratory comparison of image quality of PET scanners using the NEMA NU 2-2001 procedure for assessment of image quality,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 2193–2207 (2005).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month