1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An experimental and computational investigation of the standard temperature-pressure correction factor for ion chambers in kilovoltage x rays
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2799580
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/12/10.1118/1.2799580
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/12/10.1118/1.2799580

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the experimental setup. The ion chambers were supported by an aluminum stand within a cylindrical PMMA vessel (0.65 cm thick walls) and laser-aligned in the center of the field. The field size was collimated to a diameter of 9 cm at a distance of 100 cm. Note that the diagram is not drawn to scale, and the x-ray tube and monitor chamber are only shown for perspective.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Measured and calculated responses due to the unfiltered 60 kV beam as a function of air density for the NE 2571, Exradin A19, and NE 2505/3 chambers enclosed in the PMMA vessel (Fig. 1). -corrected measurements (closed symbols) were fit to second-order polynomials which were then normalized to unity at the reference air density . Calculated values of chamber response (open symbols) were normalized to the fit line for each chamber using the method of least squares. The NE 2505/3 chambers were modeled using the composition of the wall measured with x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (Table II). The NE 2571 and Exradin A19 were modeled with no impurities. All statistical uncertainties on the calculations are or less.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

As in Fig. 2 except for the 150 kV beam, with the range of the ordinate significantly reduced. The more softly filtered 150 kV beam was used with the NE 2571 chamber (Table III). Statistical uncertainties on the calculations are approximately .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

As in Fig. 2 but for the modified Exradin A2 chambers. Experimental results are indicated by closed symbols, and the corresponding EGSnrc calculations by open symbols. The dashed line shows results for an Exradin A2 made with C-552 air-equivalent plastic walls and electrode. The dotted line shows results for an otherwise identical chamber with an aluminum electrode of the same thickness (1 mm). Results for these same two chambers with an aluminum thimble replacing the C-552 plastic walls are shown in the solid lines and dotted-dashed lines, respectively. Statistical uncertainties on the calculations are or less.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

As in Fig. 2 for the modified Exradin A2 chambers and the 150 kV beam. As is the case for the NE type chambers, the scale of the ordinate is significantly reduced relative to the corresponding data for the unfiltered 60 kV beam (Fig. 4). Statistical uncertainties on the calculations are approximately .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

As in Fig. 2 for the 100 kV and unfiltered 60 kV beams incident on Exradin A12 chamber enclosed in the PMMA vessel. -corrected responses were calculated with (dotted line) and without (dashed line) the addition of high- impurities in the C-552 plastic. Since calculations of response for the 60 kV beam case did not reflect the variation observed experimentally, the data were collectively normalized to unity in order to make differences in the respective trends easier to visualize. The calculated responses for the 100 kV beam were normalized to the experimental data as in Fig. 2. All statistical uncertainties on the calculations are or less.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Measured and EGSnrc-calculated air kerma calibration coefficients as a function of beam effective energy for the Exradin A12 chamber used in this study. values were calculated for the chamber simulated with (dotted line) and without (dashed lines) high- impurities in the C-552 plastic walls, and normalized to the experimental value corresponding to the 250 kV beam (, Table III). The composition of C-552 with impurities (463 ppm) was taken from a chemical analysis published in a previous study (Ref. 25). All statistical uncertainties on the calculations are or less, and the uncertainties on the experimental values with the correlations removed are approximately .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

As in Fig. 7 but for the NE 2571 and Exradin A19 chambers with no impurities. Statistical uncertainties on the calculations are or less, and the uncertainties on the experimental values with the correlations removed are approximately .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Calculations of the -corrected response of the NE 2571 chamber free in air (no PMMA vessel) as a function of air density for two different geometrical configurations: the one used in this study, and the cylindrical one shown in Fig. 1 of our preceding paper (Ref. 3). A 40 kV PTB spectrum was used as the incident beam (see Table II of La Russa and Rogers, Ref. 3), and the solid line shows data from Fig. 3 of our preceding paper using the EGSnrc CAVRZnrc user-code (Ref. 26). The dotted line shows the same calculations using the “cavity” user code and the identical chamber geometry as that defined by CAVRZnrc. The dashed line shows the calculations of the cavity user code using a more accurate model of the chamber which includes the cone-shaped top. This latter geometry is the same as that used throughout the rest of this study for that chamber.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Physical characteristics of the Farmer-type thimble ionization chambers as modeled in this investigation. The diameter of the electrodes are all 1.0 mm, including the Exradin A2 chambers which normally come with a 4.6 mm diameter electrode. In all cases, the wall thickness was sufficient to provide full buildup for each beam quality used in this investigation. The mean chord length, , represents the average distance an electron must travel to cross the cavity, given by , where is the volume of the cavity and is the surface area. Radiographs and schematic diagrams of the NE 2571 and Exradin A12 chambers are given in Ref. 9, and the NE 2505/3 chambers were used in previous studies (Ref. 7).

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Results of the x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy analysis of the graphite and dural thimbles for the NE 2505/3 chamber listed in Table I. The total of the respective fractions for dural did not equal so the balance of the composition was taken as aluminum in our EGSnrc model.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

X-ray beams used in the investigation. The half-value layer (HVL) is defined as the thickness of material (Al or Cu) required to reduce the measured air kerma to one-half of the original value at 1 m distance from the source. The calculated HVLs for the simulated spectra were determined using Eq. 12 of Ref. 11. The effective energies in this case are defined as the energy of a monoenergetic photon beam having the same HVL as the corresponding spectrum.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Estimated uncertainties associated with the experimentally measured chamber response per unit response of the monitor chamber.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/12/10.1118/1.2799580
2007-11-15
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: An experimental and computational investigation of the standard temperature-pressure correction factor for ion chambers in kilovoltage x rays
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/12/10.1118/1.2799580
10.1118/1.2799580
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM