No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems
1.V. N. Cooper, T. Oshiro, C. H. Cagnon, T. M. McLeod-Stockmann, and N. V. Bezrukiy, “Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: A comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems,” Med. Phys. 30, 2614–2621 (2003).
3.R. Sivaramakrishna, N. A. Obuchowski, W. A. Chilcote, G. Cardenosa, and K. A. Powell, “Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: A preference study,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 45–51 (2000).
4.U. Bick, M. L. Giger, R. A. Schmidt, R. M. Nishikawa, and K. Doi, “Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms,” Radiographics 16, 1403–1411 (1996).
5.E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick, M. Yaffe, J. K. Baum, S. Acharyya, E. F. Conant, L. L. Fajardo, L. Bassett, C. D’Orsi, R. Jong, and M. Rebner, “Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening,” N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1773–1783 (2005).
6.S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, I. Levis, M. Sayag, R. Kleehammer, R. Heidsieck, and C. J. d’Orsi, “Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: Physical characteristics of a clinical system,” Med. Phys. 27, 1832–1840 (2000).
7.S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, and S. Vedantham, “Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system,” Proc. SPIE 4682, 21–29 (2002).
8.J. G. Yorker, L. S. Jeromin, D. L. Y. Lee, E. F. Palecki, K. P. Golden, and Z. Jing, “Characterization of a full-field digital mammography detector based on direct x-ray in selenium,” Proc. SPIE 4682, 21–29 (2002).
9.R. S. Saunders, E. Samei, J. L. Jesneck, and J. Y. Lo, “Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 533, 560–570 (2004).
10.Y. El-Mohri, L. E. Antonuk, K. W. Jee, Y. Kang, Y. Li, A. Sawant, Z. Su, Y. Wang, J. Yamamoto, and Q. Zhao, “Evaluation of novel direct-and indirect-detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for mammography,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 168–180 (2003).
11.E. A. Berns, R. E. Hendrick, and G. R. Cutter, “Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice,” Med. Phys. 29, 830–834 (2002).
12.C. M. Kuzmiak, E. D. Pisano, E. B. Cole, D. Zeng, C. B. Burns, C. Roberto, D. Pavic, Y. Lee, B. K. Seo, M. Koomen, and D. Washbum, “Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms,” Med. Phys. 32, 3144–3150 (2005).
13.W. Huda, A. M. Sajewicz, K. M. Ogden, and D. R. Dance, “Experimental investigation of the dose and image characteristics of a digital mammography system,” Med. Phys. 30, 442–448 (2003).
14.M. G. Bisogni, D. Bulajic, P. Delogu, M. E. Fantacci, M. Novelli, M. Quattrocchi, V. Rosso, and A. Stefanini, “Performance of different digital mammography imaging systems: Evaluation and comparison,” Nucl. Instrum. and Methods 546, 14–18 (2005).
15.IEC 62220-1-2 2005, “Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—Part 1-2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency—Mammography detectors,” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
16.CEC (European Commission), S. Van Voudenberg, M. Thijssen, K. Young, and S. Törnberg, “European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening,” 3rd ed., Report EUR No. 14821, Luxembourg, 1999.
17.Mammography Quality Standards Act 1992, 42 USC 102-539.
18.E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, and D. A. Reimann, “A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device,” Med. Phys. 25, 102–113 (1998).
19.J. T. Dobbins, “Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital systems,” Med. Phys. 22, 171–181 (1995).
20.J. T. Dobbins, D. L. Ergun, L. Rutz, D. A. Hinshaw, H. Blume, and D. C. Clark, “DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices,” Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995).
21.C. D. Bradford, W. W. Peppler, and J. T. Dobbins, “Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system,” Med. Phys. 26, 27–37 (1999).
23.A. K. Bloomquist, M. J. Yaffe, E. D. Pisano, R. E. Hendrick, G. E. Mawdsley, S. Bright, S. Z. Shen, M. Mahesh, E. L. Nickoloff, R. C. Fleischman, M. B. Williams, A. D. A. Maidment, D. J. Beideck, J. Och, and J. A. Seibert, “Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: Part I,” Med. Phys. 33, 719–736 (2006).
25.A.-K. Carton, D. Vandenbroucke, L. Struye, A. D. A. Maidment, Y.-H. Kao, M. Albert, H. Bosmans, and G. Marchal, “Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control,” Med. Phys. 32, 1684–1695 (2005).
28.E. Samei and M. J. Flynn, “An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems,” Med. Phys. 29, 447–459 (2002).
29.M. J. Flynn and E. Samei, “Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2 and 4 storage phosphor radiography systems,” Med. Phys. 26, 1612–1623 (1999).
30.S. Arakawa, W. Itoh, K. Kohda, and T. Suzuki, “Novel computed radiography system with improved image quality by detection of emissions from both sides of an imaging plate,” Proc. SPIE 3659, 572–581 (1999).
31.M. Aslund, B. Cederström, M. Lundqvist, and M. Danielsson, “Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 33, 933–940 (2006).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month