1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system : A signal-detection study
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2745920
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/7/10.1118/1.2745920
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/7/10.1118/1.2745920

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

system shielding. Slots machined into the system shielding allow the easy interchange of pinhole apertures (three plates are pictured, surrounding the object space). Four modular gamma cameras are used with the system with one abutting each of the ports seen in the shielding. A lid is affixed and the entire system is elevated so that a rotation stage may be used for tomographic data acquisition.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Example signal images (generated from a signal) used in the study. (a) Aperture 0 had a magnification of 1.6 and five pinholes. (b) Aperture 1 had a magnification of 3.33 and one pinhole. (c) Aperture 2 had a magnification of 2.47 and nine pinholes. (d) Aperture 3 had a magnification of 3.33 and four pinholes.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Bead phantom used to generate random background images. The phantom is filled with nonuniform polystyrene beads which are then stirred after each image to simulate object variability. Radioactive liquid occupies the space surrounding the beads.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Projection images of an example bead background dominated by (a) counting noise, and (b) structured bead noise. Projection images of an example lumpy background dominated by (c) counting noise, and (d) structured lump noise.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Example 2D projections of 3D lumpy backgrounds for lump widths of (a) , (b) , and (c) .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

SNR for detection in a lumpy background with increasing exposure time. (a) Signal size is . (b) Signal size is (c) Signal size is . Please refer to Table I for aperture information. Note: Scales have been fixed across the three plots in this figure.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

SNR for detection in a bead background with increasing exposure time. (a) Signal size is . (b) Signal size is . (c) Signal size is . Please refer to Table I for aperture information. Note: Scales have been fixed across the three plots in this figure.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

SNR for different backgrounds as a function of exposure time. (a) Signal diameter , Aperture 1. (b) Signal diameter , Aperture 3. (c) Signal diameter , Aperture 0. Please refer to Table I for aperture information. Note: Scales have been fixed across the three plots in this figure.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

(a) AUC as a function of channel width for three different aperture and signal combinations. Channel widths producing the minimum MSE between the signal and the 0th order Laguerre–Gauss polynomial are indicated by arrows. (b) AUC as a function of number of channels for the same three aperture and signal combinations as were used in (a). The arrow indicates the number of channels for the signal-detection study in lumpy backgrounds. Channel widths used for this study are the same as indicated by the arrows in (a).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

(a) Maximum AUC values (out of 20 possible aperture combinations) as a function of signal diameter and lump size (a total of 77 combinations). (b) The total number of occurrences of each aperture in the top-five performing aperture combinations for all signal and lump combinations.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

A map of the frequency of occurrence of Apertures 0, 1, and 3 among the top-five performing aperture combinations as a function of signal size and lump size. Green corresponds to Aperture 0, blue corresponds to Aperture 1, and red corresponds to Aperture 3. The plot is dominated by Aperture 1 (blue and purple sections) but there is a large region in which Aperture 3 appears most critical to generating high AUC and a smaller region where Aperture 0 is most critical.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Example system configuration. Aperture number, magnification, number of pinholes, pinhole diameter, sensitivity (normalized to the most sensitive aperture), and full opening angle are provided.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

The first six columns of the table provide aperture combinations, AUC, and standard deviation values for two example signal and lump combinations. Note the differences in rank order for the aperture combinations. The final three columns provide ranked aperture combinations, AUC and standard deviation values for all aperture combinations averaged over the 77 signal and lump pair combinations. represents signal diameter while refers to lump width.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Aperture combinations returning maximum AUC values for all signal and lump combinations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/7/10.1118/1.2745920
2007-06-26
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Hardware assessment using the multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): A signal-detection study
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/7/10.1118/1.2745920
10.1118/1.2745920
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM