No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
64 slice MDCT generally underestimates coronary calcium scores as compared to EBT: A phantom study
1.R. A. O’Rourke et al., “American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: Committee members,” Circulation 102, 126–140 (2000).
3.N. D. Wong et al., “Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events,” Am. J. Cardiol. 86, 495–498 (2000).
4.J. A. Rumberger et al., “Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: A histopathologic correlative study,” Circulation 92, 2157–2162 (1995).
5.M. J. Budoff et al., “Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: A multi-center study,” Circulation 93, 898–904 (1996).
6.J. A. Rumberger et al., “Electron beam computed tomography and coronary artery disease: Scanning for coronary artery calcifications,” Mayo Clin. Proc. 71, 369–377 (1996).
7.A. Schmermund et al., “Coronary artery calcium in acute coronary syndromes: A comparative study of electron-beam computed tomography, coronary angiography, and intracoronary ultrasound in survivors of acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina,” Circulation 96, 1461–1469 (1997).
8.A. S. Agatston, W. R. Janowitz, and F. J. Hildner, “Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 15, 827–832 (1990).
9.T. Q. Callister, B. Cooil, and S. P. Raya, “Coronary artery disease: Improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method,” Radiology 208, 807–814 (1998).
10.J. Horiguchi, Y. Shen, and Y. Akiyama, “Electron beam CT versus 16-slice MDCT on the variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements in a variable rate phantom,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 995–1000 (2005).
11.J. Horiguchi et al., “Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: How accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume?,” Eur. Radiol. 16, 374–380 (2006).
12.A. L. Daniell et al., “Accuracy of coronary artery calcium estimates between MDCT and electron beam tomography,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 1542–1545 (2005).
13.C. R. Becker, T. Kleffel, and A. Crispin, “Coronary artery calcium measurement: Agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 1295–1298 (2001).
14.W. Stanford, B. H. Thompson, T. Burns, “Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT,” Radiology 230, 397–402 (2004).
15.A. Knez et al., “Determination of coronary calcium with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: A comparative study with electron-beam CT,” Int. J. Card. Imaging 18, 295–303 (2002).
16.J. Horiguchi et al., “Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 184, 1917–1923 (2005).
17.M. J. Budoff et al., “Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography, A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology,” Circulation114, 1761–1791 (2006).
18.A. B. Sevrukov, J. M. Bland, and G. T. Kondos, “Serial electron beam CT measurements of coronary artery calcium: Has your patient’s calcium score actually changed?,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 185, 1546–1553 (2005).
19.J. E. Hokanson et al., “Evaluating changes in coronary artery calcium: An analytic method that accounts for interscan variability,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 1327–1332 (2004).
20.S. Achenbach et al., “In-plane coronary artery arterial motion velocity: Measurement with electron-beam CT,” Radiology 216, 457–463 (2000).
21.M. B. M. Hofman, S. A. Wickline, and C. H. Lorenz, “Quantification of in-plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: Implications for acquisition windows duration for MR flow quantification,” J. Magn. Reson Imaging 8, 568–576 (1998).
22.T. Flohr and B. Ohnesorge, “Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 25, 907–923 (2001).
23.H. Yoon, L. E. Greaser, and R. Mather, “Coronary artery calcium: Alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation,” Acad. Radiol. 4, 666–673 (1997).
24.P. M. van Ooijen et al., “Influence of scoring parameter settings on Agatston and volume scores for coronary calcification,” Eur. Radiol. 15, 102–110 (2004).
25.R. Vliegenthart, B. Song, and A. Hofman, “Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT: Effect of section thickness on calcium scoring in vitro and in vivo,” Radiology 229, 520–525 (2003).
26.J. J. Carr et al., “Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for quantification of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT,” AJR 174, 915–921 (2000).
27.S. Ulzheimer and W. A. Kalender, “Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography,” Eur. Radiol. 13, 484–497 (2003).
29.C. R. Becker et al., “Helical and single-slice conventional CT versus electron beam CT for the quantification of coronary artery calcification,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 174, 543–547 (2000).
30.J. Horiguchi, T. Nakanishi, and K. Ito, “Quantification of coronary artery calcium using multidetector CT and a retrospective ECG-gating reconstruction algorithm,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 177, 1429–1435 (2001).
31.T. Schlosser et al., “Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of reconstruction interval and reconstruction increment using 64-MDCT,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1063–1068 (2007).
33.C. Hong et al., “Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row CT: Influence of heart rate and measurement methods on interacquisition variability—initial experience,” Radiology 228, 95–100 (2003).
34.N. Funabashi et al., “Influence of heart rate on the detectability and reproducibility of multislice computed tomography for measuring coronary calcium score using a pulsating calcified mock-vessel in comparison with electron beam tomography,” Int. J. Cardiol., 113, 113–117 (2006).
35.R. Detrano et al., “Accurate coronary calcium phosphate mass measurements from electron-beam computed tomograms,” Am. J. Card. Imaging 9, 167–173 (1995).
36.C. H. McCollough et al., “A multi-institutional, multi-manufacturer, international standard for the quantification of coronary artery calcium using cardiac CT,” Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program 2003. Oak Brook, Il, p. 630.
38.T. Trabold et al., “Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating,” Rofo. 175, 1051–10555 (2003).
39.G. Muhlenbruch et al., “Evaluation of automated attenuation-based tube current adaptation for coronary calcium scoring in MDCT in a cohort of 262 patients,” Eur. Radiol. 17, 1850–1857 (2007).
40.J. Horiguchi et al., “Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT,” AJR 187, W1–6 (2006).
41.A. J. Van der Molen and J. Geleijns, “Overranging in multisection CT: Quantification and relative contribution to dose–comparison of four 16-section CT scanners,” Radiology 242, 208–216 (2007).
42.J. A. Rumberger et al., “Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: A review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons,” Mayo Clin. Proc. 74, 243–252 (1999).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month