No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Model-based cartilage thickness measurement in the submillimeter range
1.F. Eckstein, H. Sittek H., A. Gavazzeni, E. Schulte, S. Milz, B. Kiefer, M. Reiser, and R. Putz, “Magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (MR CCM): A method for accurate determination of articular cartilage thickness,” Magn. Reson. Med. 35, 89–96 (1996).
2.A. Losch, F. Eckstein, M. Haubner, and K. H. Englmeier, “A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI Part 1: Development of a computational method,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 15, 795–804 (1997).
3.H. Graichen, J. Jakob, R. von Eisenhart-Rothe, K. H. Englmeier, M. Reiser, and F. Eckstein, “Validation of cartilage volume and thickness measurements in the human shoulder with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging,” Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11, 475–482 (2003).
5.F. Eckstein, A. Gavazzeni, H. Sittek, M. Haubner, A. Losch, S. Milz, K. H. Englmeier, E. Schulte, R. Putz, and M. Reiser, “Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three-dimensional magnetic resonance chondro-crassometry (3D MR-CCM),” Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 256–265 (1996).
6.M. Haubner, F. Eckstein, M. Schnier, A. Losch, H. Sittek, C. Becker, H. Kolem, M. Reiser, and K. H. Englmeier, “A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI Part 2: Validation using CT arthrography,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 15, 805–813 (1997).
7.T. Stammberger, F. Eckstein, K. H. Englmeier, and M. Reiser, “Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living,” Magn. Reson. Med. 41, 529–536 (1999).
8.T. Stammberger, F. Eckstein, M. Michaelis, K. H. Englmeier, and M. Reiser, “Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 17, 1033–1042 (1999).
9.C. Glaser, S. Faber, F. Eckstein, H. Fischer, V. Springer, L. Heudorfer, T. Stammberger, K. H. Englmeier, and M. Reiser, “Optimization and validation of a rapid high-resolution T1-w 3D FLASH water excitation MRI sequence for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume and thickness,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 19, 177–185 (2001).
10.D. E. T. Shepherd and B. B. Seedhom, “Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb,” Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58, 27–34 (1999).
11.S. Prevrhal, K. Engelke, and W. A. Kalender, “Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: The influence of object size and CT imaging parameters,” Phys. Med. Biol. 44, 751–764 (1999).
12.S. Prevrhal, J. C. Fox, J. A. Shepherd, and H. K. Genant, “Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: Modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions,” Med. Phys. 30, 1–8 (2003).
13.Y. Sato, K. Nakanishi, H. Tanaka, T. Nishii, N. Sugano, H. Nakamura, T. Ochi, and S. Tamura, “Limits to the accuracy of 3D thickness measurement in magnetic resonance images,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2208, 803–810 (2001).
14.Y. Sato, H. Tanaka, T. Nishii, K. Nakanishi, N. Sugano, T. Kubota, H. Nakamura, H. Yoshikawa, T. Ochi, and S. Tamura, “Limits on the accuracy of 3-D thickness measurement in magnetic resonance images-Effects of voxel anisotropy,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 1076–1088 (2003).
15.G. Dougherty and D. Newman, “Measurement of thickness and density of thin structures by computed tomography: A simulation study,” Med. Phys. 26, 1341–1348 (1999).
16.H. Fujita, K. Doi, and L. E. Fencil, “Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 2. Computerized determination of vessel sizes in digital subtraction angiography,” Med. Phys. 14, 549–556 (1987).
17.R. C. Chan, W. C. Karl, and R. S. Lees, “A new model-based technique for enhanced small-vessel measurements in X-Ray Cine-angiograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 243–255 (2000).
18.K. R. Hoffmann, D. P. Nazareth, L. Miscolczi, A. Gopal, Z. Wang, S. Rudin, and D. R. Bednarek, “Vessel size measurements in angiograms: A comparison of techniques,” Med. Phys. 29, 1622–1633 (2002).
20.J. A. E. Spaan, R. ter Wee, J. W. G. E. van Teeffelen, G. Streekstra, M. Siebes, C. Kolyva, H. Vink, D. S. Fokkema, and E. VanBavel, “Visualisation of intromural coronary vasculature by an imaging cryomicrotome suggests compartmentalization of myocardial perfusion areas,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 43, 431–435 (2005).
21.F. Boven, M. A. Bellemanns, J. Geurts, and R. Potvliege, “A comparative study of the patellofemoral joint on axial roentgenogram axial arthrogram and computed tomography following arthrography,” Skeletal Radiol. 8, 179–181 (1982).
22.H. Ihara, “Double contrast CT arthrography of the cartilage of the patellofemoral joint,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 198, 50–55 (1985).
23.B. M. ter Haar Romeny, Front-End Vision and Multi-Scale Image Analysis (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2003), p. 102.
24.W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992), p. 691.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month