1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Waveform simulation based on 3D dose distribution for acoustic wave generated by proton beam irradiation
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2767985
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/9/10.1118/1.2767985
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/9/10.1118/1.2767985
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

2D measurement method of symmetric proton beam irradiation. The IP was inserted into the gap between the two oblique edges formed by PMMA holders.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Schematic image of the pressure calculation. An imaginary component of 3D dose distribution is added above the water surface of the original 3D dose distribution.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Depth dose and quenching factor. The amount of the modulation weights of range-shifted PSL curves and depth doses from 125 MeV proton beam are relative. As a reference, the quenching factor, which was simply scaled down from Ref. 11, and the calculated dose by quenching factor at the Bragg peak were shown.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Calculated 3D dose distribution for the Bragg curve: (a) Image in the plane and depth dose profile on beam axis and (b) image in the plane and lateral dose profile at the Bragg peak. Profiles before and after 3D calculation are represented by solid lines and dotted lines, respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Steps of waveform calculation and results.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Acoustic waveforms calculated for one point at the center of the detector, for distributed five points in axis of the detector and for distributed 300 points in which the size of each element is equal to the voxel size of 3D dose matrix. This calculation was done for the beam at the Bragg peak of 65 mm depth and for the hydrophone at 90 mm depth.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Influence of the correction factor of the PSL quenching on the calculated acoustic waveform. waveforms were calculated for , , the adequate correction, and no-correction at the Bragg peak. These calculations were done for the beam with the Bragg peak of 65 mm depth and for the hydrophone at 140 mm depth.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Influence of the proton range on the waveform [(a), (b), (c)] and influence of off-axis measurement on the waveform [(d), (e), (f)]. Solid lines indicate the calculated pressure waveforms, while the dotted lines indicate the experimental waveforms detected by the hydrophone in water. waveforms (a), (b), and (c) were normalized using the first maximum. waveforms (d), (e), and (f) were normalized using the first maximum of the on-axis measurement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/9/10.1118/1.2767985
2007-08-24
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Waveform simulation based on 3D dose distribution for acoustic wave generated by proton beam irradiation
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/34/9/10.1118/1.2767985
10.1118/1.2767985
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM