No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system
1.L. T. Niklason et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology 205, 399–406 (1997).
4.A. Smith, “Full-field breast tomosynthesis,” Radiol. Manage. 27, 25–31 (2005).
5.Y. Chen, J. Y. Lo, and J. T. Dobbins III, “Impulse response analysis for several digital tomosynthesis mammography reconstruction algorithms,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 541–549 (2005).
6.S. Suryanarayanan et al., “Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography,” Acad. Radiol. 8, 219–224 (2001).
7.T. Mertelmeier, J. Orman, W. Haerer, and M. K. Dudam, “Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device,” Proc. SPIE 6142, 61420F (2006).
8.B. Ren et al., “Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 550–561 (2005).
9.M. Bissonnette et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 529–540 (2005).
10.J. Zhou, B. Zhao, and W. Zhao, “A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system,” Med. Phys. 34, 1098–1109 (2007).
11.J. R. S. Saunders, E. Samei, J. L. Jesneck, and J. Y. Lo, “Physical characterization of a prototype selenium-based full field digital mammography detector,” Med. Phys. 32, 588–599 (2005).
12.B. Lazzari et al., “Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype for full-field digital mamography with an a-Se flat-panel detector,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 656–666 (2003).
13.J. L. Jesneck et al., “Detector evaluation of a prototype amorphous selenium-based full field digital mammography system,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 478–485 (2005).
14.J. G. Yorker et al., “Characterization of a full-field digital mammography detector based on direct x-ray conversion in selenium,” Proc. SPIE 4682, 21–29 (2002).
15.M. Flynn, C. Dodge, D. Peck, and A. Swinford, “Optimal radiographic techniques for digital mammograms obtained with an amorphous selenium detector,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 147–156 (2003).
16.W. Zhao, R. Deych, and E. Dolazzab, “Optimization of operational conditions for direct digital mammography detectors for digital tomosynthesis,” Proc. SPIE 5745, 1272–1281 (2005).
17.H. Fujita, D. Tsai, T. Itoh, K. Doi, J. Morishata, K. Uedo, and A. Ohtsuka, “A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11, 34–39 (1992).
18.W. Zhao and J. A. Rowlands, “Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency,” Med. Phys. 24, 1819–1833 (1997).
19.J. G. Mainprize et al., “Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis,” Med. Phys. 33, 3159–3164 (2006).
20.G. Hajdok et al., “Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors,” Med. Phys. 33, 3601–3620 (2006).
21.W. Que and J. A. Rowlands, “X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: Inherent spatial resolution,” Med. Phys. 22, 365–374 (1995).
22.E. Samei, M. J. Flynn, and D. A. Reimann, “A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device,” Med. Phys. 25, 102–113 (1998).
24.A. D. A. Maidment and M. Albert, “Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function,” Med. Phys. 30, 248–253 (2003).
25.J. T. Dobbins III et al., “DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices,” Med. Phys. 22, 1581–1593 (1995).
26.J. C. Dainty and R. Shaw, Image Science, Principle, Analysis and Evaluation of Photographic-type Imaging Processing (Academic, New York, 1974).
28.J. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 1863 (1997).
31.W. Zhao, G. DeCrescenzo, and J. A. Rowlands, “Investigation of lag and ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel x-ray detectors,” Proc. SPIE 4682, 9–19 (2002).
33.W. Zhao et al., “Ghosting caused by bulk charge trapping in direct conversion flat-panel detectors using amorphous selenium,” Med. Phys. 32, 488–500 (2005).
34.G. Pang, W. Zhao, and J. A. Rowlands, “Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Geometrical and effective fill factors,” Med. Phys. 25, 1636–1646 (1998).
35.R. L. Weisfield and N. R. Bennett, “Electronic noise analysis of a 127-mu m pixel TFT/photodiode array,” Proc. SPIE 4320, 209–218 (2001).
36.B. Zhao and W. Zhao, “Characterization of a direct full-field flat-panel digital mammography detector,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 157–167 (2003).
37.J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “A ghost story: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager,” Med. Phys. 26, 1624–1641 (1999).
38.J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Effects of image lag,” Med. Phys. 26, 2635–2647 (1999).
39.T. Wu, R. H. Moore, and D. B. Kopans, “Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis,” Med. Phys. 33, 2461–2471 (2006).
40.V. Loustauneau et al., “Imaging performance of a clinical selenium flat-panel detector for advanced applications in full-field digital mammography,” Proc. SPIE 5030, 1010–1020 (2003).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month