1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.2919768
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/35/6/10.1118/1.2919768
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/35/6/10.1118/1.2919768

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Simulated calcifications were overlapped with the uniform background (top) and the tissue structure background (bottom) and acquired with the FP-based mammography system at . Six locations each containing MC were circled. (b) Simulated calcifications were overlapped with the uniform background (top) and the tissue structure background (bottom) and acquired with the FP-based mammography system at . One location without MC was squared and used as a control.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Simulated MC clusters were overlapped with the uniform background (top) and the tissue structure background (bottom) and acquired with the FP-based mammography system at .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) The ROC curves for all readers and all MC sizes combined for various imaging system-dose level combinations for the uniform background. (b) The ROC curves for all readers and all MC sizes combined for various imaging system-dose level combinations for the tissue structure background.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The ’s for all readers combined plotted as a function of the average simulated MC size for various imaging system-dose level combinations.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Physical characteristics and specifications of two digital mammography systems.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

The size ranges and the average sizes of the simulated microcalcification groups in this study.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

The ’s for all readers and all MC sizes combined along with the -values used to compare the two imaging systems in detecting simulated MCs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/35/6/10.1118/1.2919768
2008-05-16
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Comparison of slot scanning digital mammography system with full-field digital mammography system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/35/6/10.1118/1.2919768
10.1118/1.2919768
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM