1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An MLC calibration method using a detector array
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3218767
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/10/10.1118/1.3218767
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/10/10.1118/1.3218767

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Minor leaf offsets are defined as the spatial offset of each leaf in a leaf bank relative to the reference leaf, leaf 20. Major leaf offsets are defined as the distance of the reference leaf to the radiation center of the beam.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) The RDRL method requires precisely known detector positions; small positional errors in the array’s detectors can disrupt this method by introducing false offsets into the leaf positions. The detector offsets are corrected for, which effectively creates uniform detector positions. (b) Two detectors are located in the projection of each leaf and measure the position of the leaf end.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The measurements required to radiographically align the array. The thick solid line shows an open field measurement used for comparing the alignment profiles, the dashed line shows the initial setup of the array, and the thin solid line shows a correct radiographic alignment with the backup jaw after repositioning the array.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Detector offsets relative to a reference detector. The reference detector is chosen based on which detector lies in the projection of the reference leaf. Detectors at −0.4, 4.4, and 10 cm displayed a larger than average offset value as shown by the solid line. After detector replacement, the dashed line shows the nominal offsets. (b) Measurements with each backup jaw located at the CAX position. The mirrored behavior of the three large spikes on the profiles indicates that they are due to positional errors.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

MLC leaf offsets relative to leaf number 20, the reference leaf.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Change in the relative MLC offsets after replacement of the primary Mylar mirror.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Calibration of the X1 MLC leaf bank. Measurements show the relative MLC positions before calibration and after two iterations of the RDRL method with the profiler.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

List of collimator settings for Profiler 2 measurements of the X1 MLC leaf bank at CAX for minor leaf offsets in Sec. ???. Settings are based on the IEC 1217 Convention.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

List of additional collimator settings for Profiler 2 measurements of the major leaf offsets in Sec. ???. The fields listed are for measurement of the X1 reference leaf at retracted, SYM fields, and extended, X1 fields; the CAX fields were measured during the minor leaf offsets in Sec. ???. Settings are based on the IEC 1217 Convention.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/10/10.1118/1.3218767
2009-09-09
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: An MLC calibration method using a detector array
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/10/10.1118/1.3218767
10.1118/1.3218767
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM