1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
JPEG2000 3D compression vs 2D compression: An assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3075824
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/3/10.1118/1.3075824
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/3/10.1118/1.3075824
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/3/10.1118/1.3075824
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/3/10.1118/1.3075824
2009-02-19
2014-07-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: JPEG2000 3D compression vs 2D compression: An assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/3/10.1118/1.3075824
10.1118/1.3075824
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM