No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Fixed gantry tomosynthesis system for radiation therapy image guidance based on a multiple source x-ray tube with carbon nanotube cathodes
1.A. H. Baydush, D. J. Godfrey, M. Oldham, and J. T. Dobbins III, “Initial application of digital tomosynthesis with on-board imaging in radiation oncology,” in Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, edited by M. J. Flynn (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005), Vol. 5745, pp. 1300–1305.
2.M. Svatos, G. Pang, B. Gangadharan, J. Maltz, A. Bani-Hashemi, P. O’Brien, and J. Rowlands, “4D cone beam digital tomosynthesis (CBDT) and digitally reconstructed tomograms (DRTs) for improved image guidance of lung radiotherapy,” Med. Phys. 32, 2161 (2005).
3.D. J. Godfrey, F.-F. Yin, M. Oldham, S. Yoo, and C. Willett, “Digital tomosynthesis with an on-board kilovoltage imaging device,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 65, 8–15 (2006).
4.G. Pang, A. Bani-Hashemi, P. Au, P. F. O’Brien, J. A. Rowlands, G. Morton, T. Lim, P. Cheung, and A. Loblaw, “Megavoltage cone beam digital tomosynthesis (MV-CBDT) for image-guided radiotherapy: A clinical investigational system,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 999–1013 (2008).
5.M. Descovich, O. Morin, J. F. Aubry, M. Aubin, J. Chen, A. Bani-Hashemi, and J. Pouliot, “Characteristics of megavoltage cone-beam digital tomosynthesis,” Med. Phys. 35, 1310–1316 (2008).
6.J. Maltz, B. Gangadharan, D. Hristov, and M. Svatos, “Volumetric cone beam reconstruction engines for 4D image guidance,” Med. Phys. 32, 2091–2092 (2005).
7.D. Lalush, E. Quan, R. Rajaram, J. Zhang, J. Lu, and O. Zhou, “Tomosynthesis reconstruction from multi-beam x-ray sources,” Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, April 2006 (unpublished), pp. 1180–1183.
9.H. Ijiri, H. Ohgaki, Y. Uozumi, T. Sakae, and M. Matoba, “Development of soft x-ray sources with electron guns of field emission- and thermal cathode-types and their application to counter experiments,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 33, 423–428 (1996).
11.H. Sugie, M. Tanemura, V. Filip, K. Iwata, K. Takahashi, and F. Okuyama, “Carbon nanotubes as electron source in an x-ray tube,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2578–2580 (2001).
12.G. Z. Yue, Q. Qiu, B. Gao, Y. Cheng, J. Zhang, H. Shimoda, S. Chang, J. P. Lu, and O. Zhou, “Generation of continuous and pulsed diagnostic imaging x-ray radiation using a carbon-nanotube-based field-emission cathode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 355–357 (2002).
14.S. Kita, Y. Watanabe, A. Ogawa, K. Ogura, Y. Sakai, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Isokane, F. Okuyama, T. Nakazato, and T. Otsuka, “Field-emission-type x-ray source using carbon-nanofibers,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 064505 (2008).
15.H. X. Wang, N. Jiang, H. Hiraki, Y. Harada, H. Zhang, J. Wang, M. Haba, and A. Hiraki, “Fabrication of field-emission cathode ray tube with a unique nanostructure carbon electron emitter,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26, 698–701 (2008).
18.Z. Liu, G. Yang, Y. Z. Lee, D. Bordelon, J. Lu, and O. Zhou, “Carbon nanotube based microfocus field emission x-ray source for microcomputed tomography,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 103111 (2006).
19.K. Kawakita, K. Hata, H. Sato, and Y. Saito, “Development of microfocused x-ray source by using carbon nanotube field emitter,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 24, 950–952 (2006).
20.J. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Cheng, B. Gao, Q. Qiu, Y. Z. Lee, J. P. Lu, and O. Zhou, “Stationary scanning x-ray source based on carbon nanotube field emitters,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 184104 (2005).
21.J. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Z. Lee, S. Chang, J. P. Lu, and O. Zhou, “Multiplexing radiography using a carbon nanotube based x-ray source,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 064106 (2006).
23.B. Faddegon, I. Hsu, F. Ghelmansarai, A. Bani-Hashemi, and J. Pouliot, “Significant improvement in megavoltage cone-beam CT in a side-by-side comparison of a cadaver imaged with x-rays from low and high-Z targets,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 66, S147–S147 (2006).
24.B. A. Faddegon, V. Wu, J. Pouliot, B. Gangadharan, and A. Bani-Hashemi, “Low dose megavoltage cone beam computed tomography with an unflattened beam from a carbon target,” Med. Phys. 35, 5777–5786 (2008).
and S. Seltzer
, “Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients (version 1.4)
,” available at http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi 2004
26.J. S. Maltz, B. Gangadharan, S. Bose, D. Hristov, B. Faddegon, A. Paidi, and A. Bani-Hashemi, “Algorithm for x-ray scatter, beam-hardening and beam profile correction in diagnostic (kilo-voltage) and treatment (megavoltage) cone beam CT,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27, 1791–1810 (2008).
27.E. Sundermann, F. Jacobs, M. Christiaens, B. D. Sutter, and I. Lemahieu, “A fast algorithm to calculate the exact radiological path through a pixel or voxel space,” Journal of Computing and Information Technology 6, 89–94 (1998).
29.F. Xu and K. Mueller, “Real-time 3D computed tomographic reconstruction using commodity graphics hardware,” 52, 3405–3419 (2007).
30.P. J. Keall, G. S. Mageras, J. M. Balter, R. S. Emery, K. M. Forster, S. B. Jiang, J. M. Kapatoes, D. A. Low, M. J. Murphy, B. R. Murray, C. R. Ramsey, M. B. V. Herk, S. S. Vedam, J. W. Wong, and E. Yorke, “The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76,” Med. Phys. 33, 3874–3900 (2006).
31.S. Sayeh, J. Wang, W. Main, W. Kilby, and C. Maurer, Respiratory Motion Tracking for Robotic Radiosurgery (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007), pp. 15–29.
32.K. M. Langen, W. Lu, W. Ngwa, T. R. Willoughby, B. Chauhan, S. L. Meeks, P. A. Kupelian, and G. Olivera, “Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy,” Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 7073–7086 (2008).
Article metrics loading...
The authors present the design and simulation of an imaging system that employs a compact multiple source x-ray tube to produce a tomosynthesisimage from a set of projections obtained at a single tube position. The electron sources within the tube are realized using cold cathodecarbon nanotube technology. The primary intended application is tomosynthesis-based 3D image guidance during external beam radiation therapy. The tube, which is attached to the gantry of a medicallinear accelerator(linac) immediately below the multileaf collimator, operates within the voltage range of and contains a total of 52 sources that are arranged in a rectilinear array. This configuration allows for the acquisition of tomographic projections from multiple angles without any need to rotate the linac gantry. The x-ray images are captured by the same amorphous silicon flat panel detector employed for portal imaging on contemporary linacs. The field of view (FOV) of the system corresponds to that part of the volume that is sampled by rays from all sources. The present tube and detector configuration provides an FOV in the plane of the linac isocenter when the imaging detector is placed from the isocenter. Since this tomosynthesis application utilizes the extremities of the detector to record image detail relating to structures near the isocenter, simultaneous treatment and imaging is possible for most clinical cases, where the treated target is a small region close to the linac isocenter. The tomosynthesisimages are reconstructed using the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique, which is accelerated using a graphic processing unit. The authors present details of the system design as well as simulated performance of the imaging system based on reprojections of patient CTimages.
Full text loading...
Most read this month