1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Sensitivity of fluorophore-quencher labeled microbubbles to externally applied static pressure
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3158734
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/8/10.1118/1.3158734
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/8/10.1118/1.3158734

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

A perfluorocarbon-filled microbubble showing the inward and outward pressure components. The pressure caused by the elasticity of the shell is not shown because it is considered to be zero for a lipid shell in this study. Revised from Ref. 37. (b) Gas diffusion through the bubble shell and the liquid medium. is the gas concentration at the gas-shell boundary and is the gas concentration at the shell-liquid boundary (both are within the shell). represents the gas concentration at the shell-liquid boundary within the liquid and is the gas concentration at infinity in the liquid.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

A flowchart describing the relationships among the models.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Normalized bubble radius as a function of time . The external pressure is applied at after the bubble is injected into the liquid medium and released at (upward and downward arrows). In (a) and , 0.4, and 0.2. In (b), and , 0.5, and 0. The multiple lines for each case represent the externally applied pressures from with increment.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Relationship between the externally applied pressure and the relative change in bubble radius. (a) Effect of XF and on the relative change in the bubble radius. (b) Effect of surface tension and initial bubble radius on the relative change in the bubble radius.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

A typical relationship between the normalized fluorophore lifetime and the F-Q distance when [Eq. (14)]. The dashed lines indicate the lifetime ratio equals 0.5 when .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Phase difference between the phases when and as a function of the externally applied pressure when the surface tensions are 0.02, 0.04, 0.05, and .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Phase sensitivity (deg/mm Hg) as a two-dimentional function of the initial bubble radius and the surface tension of the bubble: (a) , (b) , and (c) . The initial F-Q distance is .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Phase difference between the phases when and as a function of the initial F-Q distance when the surface tensions are 0.02, 0.03, and .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Phase sensitivity (deg/mm Hg) as a two-dimentional function of the initial bubble radius and the initial F-Q distance: (a) and , (b) and , (c) and , and (d) and .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Effect of the STD of the bubble size distribution on the phase sensitivity to the external pressure (deg/mm Hg).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

(a) Measurement error of phase as a function of signal to noise ratio and (b) the required SNR as a function of the number of averaging at specific phase resolutions.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Parameters for the microbubble, fluorophore, and modulation frequency (Refs. 36, 43, and 52). Typical parameters for microbubble were taken from Ref. 36, 43, and 52 and the parameters of fluorohores were chosen based on fluorescein. The modulation frequency is a typical value for detecting flurescence lifetime of the order of nanoseconds (Ref. 45 and 46).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/8/10.1118/1.3158734
2009-07-01
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Sensitivity of fluorophore-quencher labeled microbubbles to externally applied static pressure
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/36/8/10.1118/1.3158734
10.1118/1.3158734
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM