No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging
2.K. J. Strauss, in Syllabus: Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics: Cardiac Catheterization Imaging, edited by E. L. Nickoloff and K. J. Strauss (Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, IL, 1998), pp. 105–120.
3.M. G. Andreassi, L. Ait-Ali, N. Botto, S. Manfredi, G. Mottola, and E. Picano, “Cardiac catheterization and long-term chromosomal damage in children with congenital heart disease,” Eur. Heart J. 27, 2703–2708 (2006).
4.E. J. Hall and A. J. Giaccia, Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 6th ed. (Lippencott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2005).
5.I. C. R. P. Report No. 60, 1991.
6.Department of Health, Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 in Statutory Instrument No. 1059 (HMSO, London, 2000).
7.K. J. Strauss and S. C. Kaste, “The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: Striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluororscopy of pediatric patients—a white paper executive summary,” Pediatr. Radiol. 36, 110–112 (2006).
9.D. R. Kirks, Practical Pediatric Imaging: Diagnostic Radiology of Infants and Children, 3rd ed. (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 1998).
10.EUR Report No. EUR 16261, 1996.
11.P. H. Brown, R. D. Thomas, P. J. Silberberg, and L. M. Johnson, “Optimization of a fluoroscope to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric imaging,” Pediatr. Radiol. 30, 229–235 (2000).
14.M. J. Tapiovaara, A. Servomaa, M. Sandborg, and D. R. Dance, “Optimizing the imaging conditions in pediatric fluoroscopy,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 211–216 (2000).
16.J. V. Cook, “Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology,” Imaging 13, 229–238 (2001).
18.P. P. Lin, “The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters,” Med. Phys. 34, 3169–3172 (2007).
20.P. P. Lin, “Operation logic and functionality of automatic dose rate and image quality control of conventional fluoroscopy,” Med. Phys. 36, 1486–1493 (2009).
21.Z. F. Lu, E. L. Nickoloff, C. B. Ruzal-Shapiro, J. C. So, and A. K. Dutta, “New automated fluoroscopic systems for pediatric applications,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 6, 88–105 (2005).
22.D. G. W. Onnasch, A. Schemm, and H. H. Kramer, “Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography,” Br. J. Radiol. 77, 479–487 (2004).
23.J. W. Fenner, G. D. Morrison, J. Kerry, and N. West, “A practical demonstration of improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy,” Br. J. Radiol. 75, 596–602 (2002).
25.B. A. Schueler, P. R. Julsrud, J. E. Gray, J. G. Stears, and K. Y. Wu, “Radiation exposure and efficacy of exposure-reduction techniques during cardiac catheterization in children,” AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. 162, 173–177 (1994).
28.R. Schumacher and H. Allmendinger, “Optimization of pulsed fluoroscopy in pediatric radiology using voiding cystourethrography as an example,” Med. Mundi 52, 18–24 (2008).
29.V. Tsapaki, S. Kottou, N. Kollaros, P. Dafnomili, M. Koutelou, E. Vano, and V. Neofotistou, “Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures,” Br. J. Radiol. 77, 562–567 (2004).
31.A. G. Davies, A. R. Cowen, S. M. Kengyelics, J. Moore, and U. M. Sivananthan, “Do flat detector cardiac x-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing x-ray dose and image quality,” Eur. Radiol. 17, 1787–1794 (2007).
32.E. Vano, B. Geiger, A. Schreiner, C. Back, and J. Beissel, “Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: Dose and image quality,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 5731–5742 (2005).
33.D. C. Hunt, O. Tousignant, and J. A. Rowlands, “Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy,” Med. Phys. 31, 1166–1175 (2004).
34.R. M. Gagne and P. W. Quinn, in Physical and Technical Aspects of Angiography and Interventional Radiology, edited by S. Balter and T. B. Shope (Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, IL, 1995), pp. 49–58.
35.K. M. Ogden, W. Huda, and E. M. Scalzetti, “A general approach to optimizing digital mammography with respect to radiation risk,” in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, edited by M. J. Jaffe and L. E. Antonuk (SPIE, Washington, 2004), Vol. 5030.
38.E. Fredenberg, B. Cederstrom, M. Aslund, C. Ribbing, and M. Danielsson, “A tunable energy filter for medical x-ray imaging,” X-ray Optics and Instrumentation 2008, 635024 (2008).
41.J. M. H. Buckler, A Reference Manual of Growth and Development, 2nd ed. (Blackwell Science, London, 1997).
42.J. G. Hall, J. E. Allanson, K. W. Gripp, and A. M. Slavotinek, Handbook of Normal Physical Measurements, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
43.ICRP, “Publication 103: Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection,” in Annals of the ICRP (2007).
44.M. Tapiovaara, M. Lakkisto, and A. Servomaa, “PCXMC: A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations,” Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety Report No. STUK-A139, 1997.
45.J. T. Bushberg, J. A. Seibert, E. M. Leidholdt, and J. M. Boone, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001).
46.J. L. Squires, Practical Physics, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).
48.M. Sandborg, D. R. Dance, G. A. Carlsson, J. Persliden, and M. J. Tapiovaara, “A Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: Task-dependent optimization for digital imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 1659–1676 (1994).
49.E. Guibelalde, E. Vano, F. Vaquero, and L. Gonzalez, “Influence of x-ray pulse parameters on the image quality for moving objects in digital cardiac imaging,” Med. Phys. 31, 2819–2825 (2004).
50.P. Doyle, C. J. Martin, and D. Gentle, “Application of contrast-to-noise ratio in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography: Comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulations,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 2953–2970 (2006).
52.P. W. E. Schmidt, D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, I. A. Castellano Smith, and J. G. McNeill, “Conversion factors for the estimation of effective dose in paediatric cardiac angiography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3095–3107 (2000).
53.J. Rassow, A. A. Schmaltz, F. Hentrich, and C. Streffer, “Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization,” Br. J. Radiol. 73, 172–183 (2000).
54.A. Karambatsakidou, B. Sahlgren, B. Hansson, M. Lidebran, and A. Fransson, “Effective dose conversion factors in paediatric interventional cardiology,” Br. J. Radiol. 000, 1–8 (2009).
55.O. Dragusin, K. Smans, J. Jacobs, T. Inal, and H. Bosmans, “Evaluation of the contrast-detail response of a cardiovascular angiography system and the influence of the equipment variables on image quality,” in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, edited by J. Hsieh and E. Samei (SPIE, Washington, 2008), Vol. 6913.
56.J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2007).
57.J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, Tables of X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2007).
58.K. Cranley, B. J. Gilmore, G. W. A. Fogarty, and L. Desponds, “Catalogue of diagnostic x-ray spectra and other data” IPEM Report No. 78, 1997.
59.U. Neitzel, “Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: A model calculation,” Med. Phys. 19, 475–481 (1992).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month