No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: Application for mammography
3.S. Akashi-Tanaka, T. Shien, S. Tsukagoshi, S. Funabasama, K. Miyagawa, K. Terada, M. Yoshida, T. Hojo, T. Kinoshita, and N. Moriyama, “Whole-breast volume perfusion images using 256-row multislice computed tomography: Visualization of lesions with ductal spread,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 16, 62–67 (2009).
4.L. T. Niklason et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology 205, 399–406 (1997).
9.G. Ullman, M. Sandborg, D. R. Dance, M. Yaffe, and G. A. Carlsson, “A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3143–3152 (2005).
10.I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 34, 221–232 (2007).
11.J. L. Ducote and S. Molloia, “Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: A simulation study,” Med. Phys. 35, 5411–5418 (2008).
12.I. Sechopoulos, S. Vedantham, S. Suryanarayanan, C. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast,” Radiology 247, 98–105 (2008).
13.G. R. Hammerstein, D. W. Miller, D. R. White, M. E. Masterson, H. Q. Woodard, and J. S. Laughlin, “Absorbed radiation dose in mammography,” Radiology 130, 485–491 (1979).
14.X. Gong, S. J. Glick, B. Liu, A. A. Vedula, and S. Thacker, “A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging,” Med. Phys. 33, 1041–1052 (2006).
15.I. Sechopoulos and C. Ghetti, “Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 36, 1199–1207 (2009).
16.P. R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. D. Maidment, “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation,” Med. Phys. 29, 2131–2139 (2002).
17.K. Bliznakova, Z. Bliznakov, V. Bravou, Z. Kolitsi, and N. Pallikarakis, “A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation,” Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 3699–3721 (2003).
19.L. Zhou, J. Oldan, P. Fisher, and G. Gindi, “Low contrast lesion detection in tomosynthetic breast imaging using a realistic breast phantom,” in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging Conference, 2006, Vol. 6142, pp. 61425A.
21.D. R. Dance, R. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson, “Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 359–363 (2005).
22.F. J. Richard, P. R. Bakic, and A. D. Maidment, “Mammogram registration: A phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25, 188–197 (2006).
23.R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, P. R. Bakic, A. D. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. A. Carlsson, “Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 395–398 (2005).
24.D. Kontos, C. Zhang, N. V. Ruiter, P. R. Bakic, and A. D. Maidment, “Evaluating the effect of tomosynthesis acquisition parameters on image texture: A study based on an anthropomorphic breast tissue software model,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM 2008), 2008, pp. 491–498.
25.D. Kontos, P. R. Bakic, A. K. Carton, A. B. Troxel, E. F. Conant, and A. D. Maidment, “Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: A preliminary study,” Acad. Radiol. 16, 283–298 (2009).
30.A. E. Burgess, F. Jacobson, and P. F. Judy, “Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise,” Med. Phys. 28, 419–437 (2001).
31.D. Lazos, Z. Kolitsi, and N. Pallikarakis, “A software data generator for radiographic imaging investigations,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 4, 76–79 (2000).
32.International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, “Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement,” ICRU Report No. 44, 1989.
33.International Commission on Radiological Protection, “Report of the Task Group on Reference Man,” ICRP Publication No. 23 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).
34.J. H. Hubbell and S. M. Seltzer, “Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest,” NIST Report No. 5632, 1995.
36.J. Suckling et al., The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database, Exerpta Medica International Congress Series 1069, 375–378 (1994).
37.H. Li, M. L. Giger, O. I. Olopade, and M. R. Chinander, “Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment,” J. Digit Imaging 21, 145–152 (2008).
38.H. Li, M. L. Giger, Z. Huo, O. I. Olopade, L. Lan, B. L. Weber, and I. Bonta, “Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: Effect of ROI size and location,” Med. Phys. 31, 549–555 (2004).
41.J. F. Veenland, J. L. Grashius, F. van der Meer, A. L. Beckers, and E. S. Gelsema, “Estimation of fractal dimension in radiographs,” Med. Phys. 23, 585–594 (1996).
42.A. E. Burgess, “Mammographic structure: Data preparation and spatial statistics analysis,” in Proceedings of Medical Imaging 1998 Conference: Image Processing, San Diego, CA;
42.Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optics Instrumentation Engineers Conference, Bellingham, WA, 1998, Vol. 3661, pp. 642–653.
43.M. Aguilar, E. Anguiano, and M. A. Pancorbo, “Fractal characterization by frequency analysis: II. A new method,” J. Microsc. 172, 233–238 (1993).
44.G. D. Tourassi, D. M. Delong, and C. E. Floyd, “A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 1299–1312 (2006).
45.C. Caldwell, S. Stapleton, D. Holdsworth, R. Jong, W. Weiser, G. Cooke, and M. Yaffe, “Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension,” Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 235–347 (1990).
46.C. Castella, K. Kinkel, F. Descombes, M. P. Eckstein, P. E. Sottas, F. R. Verdun, and F. O. Bochud, “Mammographic texture synthesis: Second-generation clustered lumpy backgrounds using a genetic algorithm,” Opt. Express 16, 7595–7607 (2008).
47.J. J. Heine, S. R. Deans, R. P. Velthuizen, and L. P. Clarke, “On the statistical nature of mammograms,” Med. Phys. 26, 2254–2265 (1999).
48.F. O. Bochud, C. K. Abbey, and M. P. Eckstein, “Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with clustered lumpy backgrounds,” Opt. Express 4, 33–42 (1999).
49.H. Li, M. Giger, O. Olopade, A. Margolis, L. Lan, and M. Chinander, “Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms,” Acad. Radiol. 12, 863–873 (2005).
51.F. Georgsson, S. Jansson, and Ch. Olsén, “Fractal analysis of mammograms,” in Proceedings of the 15th Scandinavian Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 2007, pp. 92–101.
53.P. R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. D. Maidment, “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture,” Med. Phys. 29, 2140–2151 (2002).
55.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983).
56.F. Biagini, Y. Hu, B. Oksendal, and T. Zhang, Stochastic Calculus for Fractional Brownian Motion and Applications (Springer-Verlag, London, 2008).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month