No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system
1.L. T. Niklason, D. B. Kopans, and L. M. Hamberg, “Digital breast imaging: Tomosynthesis and digital subtraction mammography,” Breast Dis. 10, 151–164 (1998).
2.M. Skarpathiotakis, M. J. Yaffe, A. K. Bloomquist, D. Rico, S. Muller, A. Rick, and F. Jeunehomme, “Development of contrast digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 29, 2419–2426 (2002).
3.R. A. Jong, M. J. Yaffe, M. Skarpathiotakis, R. S. Shumak, N. M. Danjoux, A. Gunesekara, and D. B. Plewes, “Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience,” Radiology 228, 842–850 (2003).
4.F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, M. Taupitz, U. Bick, K. J. Winzer, C. Hüttner, S. Muller, F. Jeunehomme, and B. Hamm, “Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography—Initial experience,” RöFo, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 175, 342–345 (2003).
5.F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, F. Jeunehomme, S. Muller, B. Hamm, and U. Bick, “Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: Initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement,” Invest. Radiol. 40, 397–404 (2005).
7.C. Dromain, C. Balleyguier, S. Muller, M. C. Mathieu, F. Rochard, P. Opolon, and R. Sigal, “Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography,” Am. J. Roentgenol.187, W528–W537 (2006).
8.American Cancer Society
, Cancer Facts and Figures 2008, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2008
9.P. Baldelli, A. Bravin, C. Di Maggio, G. Gennaro, A. Sarnelli, A. Taibi, and M. Gambaccini, “Evaluation of the minimum iodine concentration for contrast-enhanced subtraction mammography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 4233–4251 (2006).
10.I. Rosado-Méndez, B. A. Palma, Y. Villaseñor, L. Benítez-Bribiesca, and M. E. Brandan, “Contrast-enhanced digital mammography and angiogenesis,” AIP Conf. Proc. 958, 278–279 (2007).
12.J. T. Bushberg, J. A. Seibert, E. M. Leidholdt, Jr., and J. M. Boone, The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Pennsylvania, 2002).
NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, “Buyer’s Guide: Digital Mammography CEP08022” (2008
14.B. Lazzari, G. Belli, C. Gori, and M. Rosselli del Turco, “Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 34, 2730–2743 (2007).
15.T. K. Nishino, X. Wu, and R. F. Johnson, Jr., “Thickness of molybdenum filter and square contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography,” Am. J. Roentgenol.185, 960–963 (2005).
16.I. Rosado-Méndez, B. Palma, and M. E. Brandan, “Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit,” Med. Phys. 35, 5544–5557 (2008).
17.C. Ghetti, A. Borrini, O. Ortenzia, R. Rossi, and P. L. Ordóñez, “Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors,” Med. Phys. 35, 456–463 (2008).
19.European Commission, in European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 4th ed., edited by N. Perry et al. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2006).
20.M. R. Lemacks, S. C. Kappadath, C. C. Shaw, X. Liu, and G. J. Whitman, “A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography—A signal-to-noise analysis,” Med. Phys. 29, 1739–1751 (2002).
21.S. C. Kappadath and C. C. Shaw, “Dual-energy digital mammography: Calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio,” Med. Phys. 30, 1110–1117 (2003).
22.S. C. Kappadath and C. C. Shaw, “Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: Scatter and nonuniformity corrections,” Med. Phys. 32, 3395–3408 (2005).
24.D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, “Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000).
26.A. K. Carton, K. Lindman, C. Ullberg, T. Francke, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Dual-energy subtraction for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis,” in Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, edited by J. Hsieh and M. Flynn
26.[Proc. SPIE 6510, U58–U69 (2007)].
27.M. E. Brandan and V. Ramírez-R., “Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit,” Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 2307–2320 (2006).
28.R. Fahrig and M. J. Yaffe, “Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: Dependence on anode material, breast thickness and lesion type,” Med. Phys. 21, 1473–1481 (1994).
29.X. Wu, E. L. Gingold, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography,” Radiology 193, 83–89 (1994).
30.X. Wu, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography,” Radiology 179, 143–148 (1991).
31.J. M. Boone, “Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary x-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data,” Med. Phys. 29, 869–875 (2002).
32.J. M. Boone, T. R. Fewell, and R. J. Jennings, “Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography,” Med. Phys. 24, 1863–1874 (1997).
33.A. K. Carton, J. Li, M. Albert, S. Chen, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Quantification for contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis,” in Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, edited by M. Flynn and J. Hsieh
33.[Proc. SPIE 6142, D1420 (2006)].
34.G. Gennaro, L. Katz, H. Souchay, R. Klausz, C. Alberelli, and C. Di Maggio, “Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 34, 547–555 (2007).
38.A. Rose, Vision: Human and Electronic (Plenum, New York, 1973).
39.G. Ullman, M. Sandborg, D. R. Dance, M. Yaffe, and G. A. Carlsson, “A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography,” Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3143–3152 (2005).
40.M. Chevalier, P. Morán, J. I. Ten, J. M. Fernandez Soto, T. Cepeda, and E. Vañó, “Patient dose in digital mammography,” Med. Phys. 31, 2471–2479 (2004).
41.A. K. Carton, J. A. Currivan, E. Conant, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Temporal subtraction versus dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot study,” in International Workshop on Digital Mammography, edited by E. A. Krupinski
41.[Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 5115, 166–173 (2008)].
42.A. K. Carton, J. Li, S. Chen, E. Conant, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Optimization of contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis,” in International Workshop on Digital Mammography, edited by S. M. Astley et al.
43.R. A. Close, K. C. Shah, and J. S. Whiting, “Regularization method for scatter-glare correction in fluoroscopic images,” Med. Phys. 26, 1794–1801 (1999).
44.A. K. Carton, R. Acciavatti, J. Kuo, and A. D. A. Maidment, “The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using a a-Si/CsI(Tl) full-field flat panel detector,” Med. Phys. 36, 920–928 (2009).
46.I. A. Cunningham, M. S. Westmore, and A. Fenster, “A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems,” Med. Phys. 21, 417–427 (1994).
47.S. Richard and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task,” Med. Phys. 34, 127–139 (2007).
48.S. Richard and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging,” Med. Phys. 35, 586–601 (2008).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month