1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Planning tools for modulated electron radiotherapy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3395573
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/5/10.1118/1.3395573
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/5/10.1118/1.3395573

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Planning and optimization process for MERT.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) EDT distances were calculated for each transverse segment, (b) EDT bins for the target, and (c) corresponding energy bins.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) MERTgui that shows the energy target bins for CW 4 case. For example, the energy target bins can be changed by using pixel, line, and block select features of this GUI that were shown in circles. (b) Optimized apertures for five energies and 11 segments (for example, 16 MeV_1, 16 MeV_2, and 16 MeV_3 are three segments that were targeted with the 16 MeV beam).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Dose_Slider_GUI combines the doses from each segment with relative weights. The Dose Superimpose button combines the doses with the weights that were set using the sliders, and the final set of weights can be saved using the save button to the specified file name. (b) Dosimetric combination planning tool.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Isodose lines demonstrating adequate target organ coverage for the MERT plan. (b) DVH comparison of MERT and conventional plans for the CW 1 case.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(a) Isodose lines demonstrating adequate target organ coverage with the MERT plan. (b) DVH comparison of MERT and conventional plans for the CW 2 case.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) Isodose lines demonstrating adequate target organ coverage with the MERT plan. (b) DVH comparison of MERT and IMRT plans for the CW 3 case.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

(a) Isodose lines showing good target organ coverage. (b) DVH comparison of MERT and IMRT plans for the CW 4 case.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

50% dosimetric combination plan for MERT and IMRT plans for the CW 2 case.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Nominal energies and corresponding effective energies modeled in Monte Carlo simulations and the 80% depth dose values that were used to create thresholds for the EDT edge bins.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

MERT plan details; gantry angle, numbers of energies, number of segments, BEAMnrc phase-space file calculation time, MCSim dose calculation time, average number of particles in phase-space file, average uncertainty, and how many segments from each of the 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV energies.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Comparison of the (Gy) of organs at risk such as heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, and contralateral breast for all treatment plans (except the contralateral breast dose in CW 2 case).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/5/10.1118/1.3395573
2010-04-27
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Planning tools for modulated electron radiotherapy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/5/10.1118/1.3395573
10.1118/1.3395573
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM