1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3457471
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/8/10.1118/1.3457471
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/8/10.1118/1.3457471

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Study design. ratio, Photographic Experts Group, structural similarity, signal-to-noise ratio, and thickness.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Reversible compression ratios. Solid and dashed lines represent the mean for 20 scans for JPEG2000 and JPEG2000 3D compressions, respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Per-image encoding times. (a) JPEG2000 compression. (b) JPEG2000 3D compression. (c) 3D-to-2D encoding-time ratio. Data are the mean for 20 scans.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Per-image decoding times. (a) JPEG2000 compression. (b) JPEG2000 3D compression. (c) 3D-to-2D decoding-time ratio. Data are the mean for 20 scans.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

PSNR results. (a) . (b) . (c) . Data are the mean for 20 scans.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

MS-SSIM results. (a) . (b) . (c) . Data are the mean for 20 scans.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Grading results from five radiologists. (a) . (b) . (c) . Data are the mean scores for 20 images averaged across the radiologists.

Tables

Generic image for table
Generic image for table
Generic image for table
TABLE I.

CT acquisition parameters.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Grading scheme in human visual analysis.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Display system and viewing conditions in human visual analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/8/10.1118/1.3457471
2010-07-22
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/37/8/10.1118/1.3457471
10.1118/1.3457471
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM