1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Diagnostic efficacy of computer extracted image features in optical coherence tomography of the precancerous cervix
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3523098
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3523098
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3523098

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Representative images of normal and high-grade CIN images with epithelium segmentation results. White curves and white arrows indicate the probe-tissue interface segmented by the CADx algorithm and black curves and black arrows indicate the segmented boundary between the epithelium and stroma. [(a)–(d)] Typical normal cervical OCT images and segmentation results. All structures are well-defined, including the epithelium (EP), the basement membrane (BM), and the stroma (ST). [(e)–(l)] CIN 2 and CIN 3 OCT images and the detections. The layered architecture becomes irregular or is not apparent. Images shown in (e) and (f) and (i) and (j) were correctly classified. Images shown in (g) and (h) and (k) and (l) were misclassified.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The flow chart of the CAD algorithm. ANOVA: Analysis of variance. PCA: Principal component analysis. LDA: Linear discriminant analysis.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Box plots of the four quantified image features. On each box, the central mark is the median, the edges of the box are the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points not considered outliers, and the outliers are marked by the plus sign. (a) The thickness. (b) The standard deviation (Std) of thickness within an image. (c) The contrast. (d) The standard deviation of contrast within an image. The p-values are from F-tests with the null hypothesis that the means have no difference.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The ROC curve generated by varying the prior probability in the LDA classification. The arrow indicates the true positive rate and false positive rate with the empirical prior probability estimated from the image set.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) CIN 1 and (b) inflammation image that was misclassified as high-grade CIN images. The layered structure in these two images was far less visible compared to normal images. (c) CIN 3 image misclassified as normal/inflammation/CIN 1. (d) The active contour segmentation of (c) failed due to irregular probe-tissue contact.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

LDA classification results compared to histopathology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3523098
2010-12-16
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Diagnostic efficacy of computer extracted image features in optical coherence tomography of the precancerous cervix
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3523098
10.1118/1.3523098
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM