1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Comparing performance of many-core CPUs and GPUs for static and motion compensated reconstruction of C-arm CT data
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3525838
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3525838
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3525838

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Speed-up for motion estimation on the three Xeon® servers using a varying number of threads compared to the Tesla™ C1060. Note that the Tesla™ C2050 performed worse (0.76×).

Tables

Generic image for table

Generic image for table

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Common C-arm CT scan protocols, according to Strobel et al. (Ref. 1) (HC: High-contrast; LC: Low-contrast).

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Main characteristics of the five computer systems used. For the Tesla™ systems, numbers for the host (CPU) system are omitted.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Description of the three data sets used.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Runtimes (in seconds) for the static reconstruction on four systems and three implementations (“Base,” “Cache,” and “E.term”). The volume size was and the subvolume size .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3525838
2010-12-29
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Comparing performance of many-core CPUs and GPUs for static and motion compensated reconstruction of C-arm CT data
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/38/1/10.1118/1.3525838
10.1118/1.3525838
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM