Comparing performance of many-core CPUs and GPUs for static and motion compensated reconstruction of C-arm CT data
Speed-up for motion estimation on the three Xeon® servers using a varying number of threads compared to the Tesla™ C1060. Note that the Tesla™ C2050 performed worse (0.76×).
Common C-arm CT scan protocols, according to Strobel et al. (Ref. 1) (HC: High-contrast; LC: Low-contrast).
Main characteristics of the five computer systems used. For the Tesla™ systems, numbers for the host (CPU) system are omitted.
Description of the three data sets used.
Runtimes (in seconds) for the static reconstruction on four systems and three implementations (“Base,” “Cache,” and “E.term”). The volume size was and the subvolume size .
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...