No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Demons deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT using an iterative intensity matching approach
2.J. H. Siewerdsen et al., “Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: Pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery,” Med. Phys. 32(1), 241–254 (2005).
3.M. J. Daly, J. H. Siewerdsen, D. J. Moseley, D. A. Jaffray, and J. C. Irish, “Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype,” Med. Phys. 33(10), 3767–3780 (2006).
4.J. H. Siewerdsen et al., in SPIE Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, Vol. 6510, pp. 65101A, 2007.
6.G. Bachar et al., “Three-dimensional tomosynthesis and cone-beam computed tomography: An experimental study for fast, low-dose intraoperative imaging technology for guidance of sinus and skull base surgery,” Laryngoscope 119(3), 434–441 (2009).
8.Y. Chan, J. H. Siewerdsen, M. A. Rafferty, D. J. Moseley, D. A. Jaffray, and J. C. Irish, “Cone-beam computed tomography on a mobile C-arm: Novel intraoperative imaging technology for guidance of head and neck surgery,” Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg. 37(1), 81–90 (2008).
10.D. Sarrut, V. Boldea, S. Miguet, and C. Ginestet, “Simulation of four-dimensional CT images from deformable registration between inhale and exhale breath-hold CT scans,” Med. Phys. 33(3), 605–617 (2006).
12.T. Chen et al., “Object-constrained meshless deformable algorithm for high speed 3D nonrigid registration between CT and CBCT,” Med. Phys. 37(1), 197–210 (2010).
14.A. Godley, E. Ahunbay, C. Peng, and X. A. Li, “Automated registration of large deformations for adaptive radiation therapy of prostate cancer,” Med. Phys. 36(4), 1433–1441 (2009).
15.S. Nithiananthan, K. K. Brock, M. J. Daly, H. Chan, J. C. Irish, and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: Convergence and accuracy,” Med. Phys. 36(10), 4755–4764 (2009).
16.X. Pennec, P. Cachier, and N. Ayache, “Understanding the ‘Demon’s algorithm’: 3D non-rigid registration by gradient descent,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 597–605, 1999.
17.J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter,” Med. Phys. 28(2), 220–231 (2001).
18.J. Feldmar et al., “Extension of the ICP algorithm to non rigid intensity-based registration of 3D volumes,” Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 66, 84–93 (1996).
19.K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, C. D. Frith, J. Poline, J. D. Heather, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, “Spatial registration and normalization of images,” Hum. Brain Mapp 3(3), 165–189 (1995).
20.A. Guimond, A. Roche, N. Ayache, and J. Meunier, “Three-dimensional multimodal brain warping using the Demons algorithm and adaptive intensity corrections,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(1), 58–69 (2001).
22.S. Nithiananthan, K. K. Brock, J. C. Irish, and J. H. Siewerdsen, “Deformable registration for intra-operative cone-beam CT guidance of head and neck surgery,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008 (EMBS 2008): Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 3634–3637, 2008.
23.J. Thirion, Fast Non-Rigid Matching of 3D Medical Images (INRIA, Valbonne, France, 1995).
25.P. Cachier, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, Fast Non Rigid Matching by Gradient Descent: Study and Improvements of the “Demons” Algorithm (INRIA, Valbonne, France, 1999).
26.G. Penney, J. Weese, J. Little, P. Desmedt, D. Hill, and D. Hawkes, “A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17(4), 586–595 (1998).
27.W. Birkfellner et al., “Stochastic rank correlation: A robust merit function for 2D/3D registration of image data obtained at different energies,” Med. Phys. 36(8), 3420–3428 (2009).
28.A. Roche, G. Malandain, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, “The correlation ratio as a new similarity measure for multimodal image registration,” in Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI‘98, p. 1115, 1998.
29.J. P. W. Pluim, J. B. A. Maintz, and M. A. Viergever, “Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(8), 986–1004 (2003).
30.H. Lu et al., “Multi-modal diffeomorphic demons registration based on point-wise mutual information,” in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 372–375, 2010.
31.M. Modat, T. Vercauteren, G. R. Ridgway, D. J. Hawkes, N. C. Fox, and S. Ourselin, “Diffeomorphic demons using normalized mutual information, evaluation on multimodal brain MR images,” presented at the SPIE Medical Imaging 2010: Image Processing, San Diego, CA, pp. 76232K, 2010.
32.D. Rueckert, L. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. Hill, M. Leach, and D. Hawkes, “Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(8), 712–721 (1999).
33.P. R. Bevington and D. K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for The Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992).
34.M. Sezgin and B. Sankur, “Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation,” J. Electron. Imaging 13(1), 146–168 (2004).
37.R. Kashani et al., “Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study,” Med. Phys. 35(12), 5944–5953 (2008).
38.S. Klein, M. Staring, K. Murphy, M. A. Viergever, and J. P. W. Pluim, “elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(1), 196–205 (2010).
39.D. Yang et al., “Technical Note: Deformable image registration on partially matched images for radiotherapy applications,” Med. Phys. 37(1), 141–145 (2010).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month