Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914
1.
1. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 1st ed., edited by L. T. Kohn, J. M. Corrigan, and M. S. Donaldson (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2000).
2.
2.The Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, National Patient Safety Agency, British Institute of Radiology, “Towards Safer Radiotherapy,” London: The Royal College of Radiologists (2008).
3.
3. L. Donaldson, Radiotherapy Risk Profile: Technical Manual [World Health Organization (WHO) Press, Geneva 27, Switzerland, 2008].
4.
4. E. C. Ford and S. Terezakis, “How safe is safe?: Risk in radiotherapy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 78, 321 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.047
5.
5. A. Mans, M. Wendling, L. N. McDermott, J.-J. Sonke, R. Tielenburg, R. Vijlbrief, B. Mijnheer, M. Van Herk, and J. C. Stroom, “Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry,” Med. Phys. 37, 26382644 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3397807
6.
6. R. Botney, “Improving patient safety in anesthesia: A success story?,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71, S182S186 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.095
7.
7. W. R. Hendee and M. G. Herman, “Improving patient safety in radiation oncology,” Med. Phys. 38, 7882 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3522875
8.
8. D. L. Cooke, A Reference Guide for Learning from Incidents in Radiation Treatment, HTA Initiative, Vol. 22 (Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2006).
9.
9. M. V. Williams, “Improving patient safety in radiotherapy by learning from near misses, incidents and errors,” Br. J. Radiol. 80, 297301 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/29018029
10.
10. P. J. Pronovost, C. A. Goeschel, K. L. Olsen, J. C. Pham, M. R. Miller, S. M. Berenholtz, J. B. Sexton, J. A. Marsteller, L. L. Morlock, A. W. Wu, J. M. Loeb, and C. M. Clancy, “Reducing health care hazards: Lessons from the Commercial Aviation Safety Team,” Health Aff. 28, w479w489 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.w479
11.
11. F. Fiorino, “CAST-ing a safety net,” Aviat. Week Space Technol. 163, 7273 (2005).
12.
12. X. Bernard-Bruls, Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience from the IAEA/NEA International Reporting System for Operating Experience 2005–2008 (2010), p. 1453.
13.
13. S. Mutic, R. S. Brame, S. Oddiraju, P. Parikh, M. A. Westfall, M. L. Hopkins, A. D. Medina, J. C. Danieley, J. M. Michalski, I. M. El Naqa, D. A. Low, and B. Wu, “Event (error and near-miss) reporting and learning system for process improvement in radiation oncology,” Med. Phys. 37, 50275036 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3471377
14.
14. J.-P. Bissonnette and G. Medlam, “Trend analysis of radiation therapy incidents over seven years,” Radiother. Oncol. 96, 139144 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.05.002
15.
15. D. L. Cooke, P. B. Dunscombe, and R. C. Lee, “Using a survey of incident reporting and learning practices to improve organisational learning at a cancer care centre,” Qual. Saf. Health Care 16, 342348 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018754
16.
16. Quality and Safety in Radiotherapy, 1st ed., edited by T. Pawlicki, P. B. Dunscombe, A. J. Mundt, and P. Scalliet (Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2010).
17.
17. B. G. Clark, R. J. Brown, J. L. Ploquin, A. L. Kind, and L. Grimard, “The management of radiation treatment error through incident learning,” Radiother. Oncol. 95(3), 344349 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.022
18.
18. T. R. Williams, Target Safely: American Society for Radiation Oncology 2010 Year in Review (American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), Fairfax, VA, 2010).
19.
19. J. Cunningham, M. Coffey, T. Knöös, and O. Holmberg, “Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (ROSIS) - Profiles of participants and the first 1074 incident reports,” Radiother. Oncol. 97, 601607 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.023
20.
20. O. Holmberg, J. Malone, M. Rehani, D. McLean, and R. Czarwinski, “Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients,” Eur. J. Radiol. 76, 1519 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.033
21.
21. J. R. Palta, J. A. Efstathiou, J. E. Bekelman, S. Mutic, C. R. Bogardus, T. R. McNutt, P. E. Gabriel, C. A. Lawton, A. L. Zietman, and C. M. Rose, “Developing a national radiation oncology registry: From acorns to oaks,” Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 2(1), 1017 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2011.06.002
22.
22.Concepts underlying AHRQ's Common Formats,” Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2011, see http://www.pso.ahrq.gov/formats/eventdesc.htm.
23.
23.IAEA training materials: Module 2, prevention of accidental exposure in radiotherapy, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2009.
24.
25.
25. M. S. Huq, B. A. Fraass, P. B. Dunscombe, J. P. Gibbons, Jr., G. S. Ibbott, P. M. Medin, A. Mundt, S. Mutic, J. R. Palta, B. R. Thomadsen, J. F. Williamson, and E. D. Yorke, “A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiation therapy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 71, S170S173 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.081
26.
26. E. C. Ford, R. Gaudette, L. Myers, B. Vanderver, L. Engineer, R. Zellars, D. Y. Song, J. Wong, and T. L. DeWeese, “Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 74, 852858 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.038
27.
27. P. B. Dunscombe, S. Iftody, N. Ploquin, E. U. Ekaette, and R. C. Lee, “The equivalent uniform dose as a severity metric for radiation treatment incidents,” Radiother. Oncol. 84, 6466 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.05.024
28.
28.ASN-SFRO experimental scale for the rating of radiation protection events affecting patients undergoing a radiotherapy procedure, Societe Francaise de Radiotherapie Oncologique; Autorite de Surete Nucleaire, 2007.
29.
29.Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,” National Institutes of Health, 2011, see http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
30.
30. E. U. Ekaette, R. C. Lee, D. L. Cooke, K.-. Kelly, and P. B. Dunscombe, “Risk analysis in radiation treatment: Application of a new taxonomic structure,” Radiother. Oncol. 80, 282287 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.004
31.
31. L. B. Marks, C. M. Rose, J. A. Hayman, and T. R. Williams, “The need for physician leadership in creating a culture of safety,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 79, 12871289 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.004
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914
2012-11-26
2016-08-30

Abstract

Purpose:

Incident learning plays a key role in improving quality and safety in a wide range of industries and medical disciplines. However, implementing an effective incident learning system is complex, especially in radiationoncology. One current barrier is the lack of technical standards to guide users or developers. This report, the product of an initiative by the Work Group on Prevention of Errors in RadiationOncology of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine, provides technical recommendations for the content and structure of incident learning databases in radiationoncology.

Methods:

A panel of experts was assembled and tasked with developing consensus recommendations in five key areas: definitions, process maps, severity scales, causality taxonomy, and data elements. Experts included representatives from all major North American radiationoncology organizations as well as users and developers of public and in-house reporting systems with over two decades of collective experience. Recommendations were developed that take into account existing incident learning systems as well as the requirements of outside agencies.

Results:

Consensus recommendations are provided for the five major topic areas. In the process mapping task, 91 common steps were identified for external beam radiation therapy and 88 in brachytherapy. A novel feature of the process maps is the identification of “safety barriers,” also known as critical control points, which are any process steps whose primary function is to prevent errors or mistakes from occurring or propagating through the radiotherapy workflow. Other recommendations include a ten-level medical severity scale designed to reflect the observed or estimated harm to a patient, a radiationoncology-specific root causes table to facilitate and regularize root-cause analyses, and recommendations for data elements and structures to aid in development of electronic databases. Also presented is a list of key functional requirements of any reporting system.

Conclusions:

Incident learning is recognized as an invaluable tool for improving the quality and safety of treatments. The consensus recommendations in this report are intended to facilitate the implementation of such systems within individual clinics as well as on broader national and international scales.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/1.4764914.html;jsessionid=8b0cIJ-qowU5MVEapAIduwzU.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=online.medphys.org/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/12/10.1118/1.4764914'
Right1,Right2,Right3,