1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spotsa)
a)Preliminary results from the research work for this paper were presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the AAPM in Philadelphia, Med. Phys. (abstract) 37, 3363 (2010).
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3671891
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/2/10.1118/1.3671891
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/2/10.1118/1.3671891

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Comparison of: (a) ion chamber measured and Monte Carlo simulated cross-line relative dose profiles at two depths for 72.5 MeV PPBS and (b) ion Chamber measured and Monte Carlo simulated cross-line relative dose profiles at three different depths for 221.8 MeV PPBS.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Comparison of in-line and cross-line lateral relative dose profiles for 72.5 MeV PPBS and 221.8 MeV PPBS at 2 cm depth measured using ion chamber.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Comparison between the ion chamber and film measured lateral relative dose profiles of 146.9 MeV PPBS at a 2 cm water equivalent depth.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

In-line lateral dose (cGy/MU) profiles of PPBSs of different energies measured at 2 cm depth.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Peak spot dose in cGy/MU at different depths for PPBSs of five different energies measured by ion chamber (IC) by placing it both at the peak of the single PPBS and the center of a 10 × 10 cm2 broad field. Spot spacing of 5 mm was used in creating the broad field. The nominal range corresponds to the depth of 90% Bragg peak dose location.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Limited dose averaging factor (LDAF) obtained from the ratio of the average PISD calculated using PPBS lateral relative dose profiles along the two principal axes and those at different angles measured using Kodak XV film at 2 cm depth.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Comparison of PISD values from the present area integration of planar PPBS dose method (PISDfull and PISDRBPC) with those from measurement with BPC (PISDBPC). All PISD values are in units of Gy mm2/MU. The PISDfull is calculated by setting the upper limit of integration for radius in Eq. (2) to a value where the relative dose value is less than the 0.1% of the PPBS peak dose. The upper limit in Eq. (2) was set to 4.08 cm, which corresponds to the radius of BPC, to calculate the PISDRBPC.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Calculated LTDCF from the present area integration of planar PPBS dose method and comparison with Monte Carlo simulated values for a virtual chamber of 9 cm radius.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Comparison of calculated PISD values (PISDfull) in (Gy mm2/MU) from the present area integration of planar PPBS dose method with the currently commissioned values in Eclipse TPS at PTCH at 2 cm depths in water. PISD full values are obtained by setting the limit of integration to an off-axis distance in the PPBS profile where the relative dose value is 0.1% of its peak value in Eq. (2), and the TPS PISD values were obtained from Monte Carlo simulation for a 20 cm radius virtual chamber.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/2/10.1118/1.3671891
2012-01-25
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A procedure to determine the planar integral spot dose values of proton pencil beam spotsa)
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/2/10.1118/1.3671891
10.1118/1.3671891
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM