1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Verification of proton range, position, and intensity in IMPT with a 3D liquid scintillator detector system
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3681948
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/3/10.1118/1.3681948
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/3/10.1118/1.3681948

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

The LS detector prototype with the coordinate system used throughout this work.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) A sample of the images of proton spots acquired with the CCD camera. Each frame represents a different proton spot of a nominal range in water of 10.5 cm delivered in 1 cm increments along the x-axis (crossline) (b) Depth profiles of the spots shown in (a) and (c) lateral profiles of the spots shown in (a).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Measured pixel size of the LSD system; (a) pixel size as a function of the distance between the image plane and the CCD (i.e., along the y-axis), the solid line represents a linear fit; (b) pixel size as a function of the lateral position on the image (i.e., along the x-axis), the solid line represents an exponential fit.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Measured proton ranges using different reference points. Plus sign (+) represents the average position between the Bragg peak and the distal 30%, black circle represent the distal 80%, open circle the distal 70%, and open square the distal 90%.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Scintillation light profile of three proton spots with different lateral position (−5.6 cm, 0 cm, and +5.6 cm). All spots are drawn centered on their peak; (b) relative difference in the intensity of two spots (−5.6 cm and +5.6 cm) relative to the central spot (x = 0 cm).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Comparison of measured proton beam range in the LS detector system with expected range.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Relative intensity measurements of proton spots along the x-axis. The pair of horizontal dotted lines represents ±2%.

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Summary of the optical and physical phenomena that alter the measured light distribution.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Comparison between expected and measured lateral position of the proton spot along the x-axis.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Measured spot position and width (FWHM) differences from a spot on the central axis as a function of its distance in the direction parallel to the camera’s axis (y-axis).

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Measured proton spot intensity. The measured value at 5 MU is not shown because it is used as a reference.

Generic image for table
TABLE V.

Differences in proton intensity as a function of position along the y-axis. The second column show the deviation in % from the light intensity of the spot at y = 0 cm after correction of the varying distances between the spot and the CCD camera. The third column further correct for the attenuation inside the LS.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/3/10.1118/1.3681948
2012-02-15
2014-04-24
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Verification of proton range, position, and intensity in IMPT with a 3D liquid scintillator detector system
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/3/10.1118/1.3681948
10.1118/1.3681948
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM