1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
In vivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy using a novel position sensitive radiation detector: Feasibility study
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.3693049
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/4/10.1118/1.3693049
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/4/10.1118/1.3693049

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Coordinate system of the RADPOS system.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

PMMA phantom (distances are in cm), d is a variable distance between 2 and 4 cm. The source moves in the colpostats (C1 and C2) and tandem (T). r and θ are the distance and angle between one of the source positions and the detector.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Typical dose distribution during a GYN treatment and position of the measurement points.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Error on the position along the x-axis (a) and along the y-axis if the sensor is parallel to the x-axis (b) or perpendicular (c); error on the position along the x-axis in a PMMA phantom (d). Error bars are the standard deviation on repeated measurements. Dashed lines show the manufacturer’s recommended spatial range for the sensor.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

MC calculated192Ir normalized photon spectra at different distances in PMMA (a) and energy absorption coefficients in water and SiO2 (b).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Variation of the MOSFET response with distance for two detectors, normalized to 1 cm distance. The mean photon energies in PMMA are given for distance of 1, 6, and 10 cm.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Radial dose function in PMMA (a) and anisotropy function at 0.5 cm (b) in water. Data in water are shown for comparison (Ref. 24).

Tables

Generic image for table
TABLE I.

Results of the dose measurements in the PMMA phantom. The third column presents the predicted TG43 dose to water in PMMA modified to take into account the mean photon energy. The values in brackets give the range of the measurements.

Generic image for table
TABLE II.

Simulation of organ motion in a phantom. The RADPOS detector is at a position simulating the Foley balloon. The detector is moved by up to 4 mm away from three different reference positions. The differences between the dose measured during the translation of the source in each catheter in the reference conditions and the same delivery when the motion is applied are reported. Numbers in bold signify that the error would be detected.

Generic image for table
TABLE III.

Simulation of source position error. Differences are between the dose delivered with the error on the position of the tip and the dose delivered if the treatment is correct.

Generic image for table
TABLE IV.

Simulation of the effect of errors on the delivery times in the tandem on the dose to the MOSFET.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/4/10.1118/1.3693049
2012-03-19
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: In vivo dosimetry for gynaecological brachytherapy using a novel position sensitive radiation detector: Feasibility study
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/4/10.1118/1.3693049
10.1118/1.3693049
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM