1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
The use of bismuth breast shields for CT should be discouraged
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014
1.
1. K. D. Hopper, S. H. King, M. E. Lobell, T. R. TenHave, and J. S. Weaver, “The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT—shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments,” Radiology 205, 853858 (1997).
2.
2. J. Geleijns, J. Wang, and C. McCollough, “The use of breast shielding for dose reduction in pediatric CT: Arguments against the proposition,” Pediatr. Radiol. 40, 17441747 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1808-2
3.
3. J. Wang, X. Duan, J. A. Christner, S. Leng, L. Yu, and C. H. McCollough, “Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation and use of a globally decreased tube current,” Med. Phys. 38, 60846092 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3651489
4.
4. J. Geleijns, M. Salvado Artells, W. J. Veldkamp, M. Lopez Tortosa, and A. Calzado Cantera, “Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality,” Eur. Radiol. 16, 23342340 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2
5.
5. S. V. Vollmar and W. A. Kalender, “Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: A comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations,” Eur. Radiol. 18, 16741682 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0934-9
6.
6. M. K. Kalra, P. Dang, S. Singh, S. Saini, and J. A. Shepard, “In-plane shielding for CT: Effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance,” Korean J. Radiol. 10, 156163 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.156
7.
7. C. Coursey, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and S. B. Greenberg, “Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: Effect on radiation dose with breast shielding,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 190, W54W61 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2017
8.
8. D. A. Leswick, M. M. Hunt, S. T. Webster, and D. A. Fladeland, “Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT,” Radiology 249, 572580 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492071430
9.
9. E. L. Antypas, F. Sokhandon, M. Farah, S. Emerson, K. G. Bis, H. Tien, and D Mezwa, “A comprehensive approach to CT radiation dose reduction: One institution’s experience,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 197, 935940 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6460
10.
10. F. V. Coakley, R. G. Gould, B. M. Yeh, and R. L. Arenson, “CT radiation dose: What can you do right now in your practice?,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 196, 619625 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5043
11.
11. K. D. Hopper, S. H. King, M. E. Lobell, T. R. TenHave, and J. S. Weaver, “The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT—Shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments,” Radiology 205, 853858 (1997).
12.
12. K. Sangroh, T. T. Yoshizumi, D. P. Frush, C. Anderson-Evans, and G. Toncheva, “Dosimetric characterisation of bismuth shields in CT: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 133(2), 105110 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp025
13.
13. Y. H. Lee, E. Park, P. K. Cho, H. S. Seo, B -K. Je, S. Suh, and K -S. Yang, “Comparative analysis of radiation dose and image quality between thyroid shielding and unshielding during CT examination of the neck,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 196, 611615 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4955
14.
14. M. H. Yilmaz, S. Albayram, and D. Yasar, “Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose,” J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 31, 138142 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000235070.50055.e6
15.
15. ICRP, “The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103,” Ann. ICRP 37(2–4), (2007).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014
2012-04-11
2014-07-13

Abstract

There is no abstract available for this article.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/1.3681014.html;jsessionid=57b86662pr6k3.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aapm/journal/medphys
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
This feature is disabled while Scitation upgrades its access control system.
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: The use of bismuth breast shields for CT should be discouraged
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/5/10.1118/1.3681014
10.1118/1.3681014
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM