1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Improvements in dose calculation accuracy for small off-axis targets in high dose per fraction tomotherapy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1118/1.4736811
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/8/10.1118/1.4736811
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/8/10.1118/1.4736811
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic diagram showing the effect of undersampling of the angular gantry locations. A quadrant of the gantry rotation is shown. For targets at machine isocenter (on-axis target), the intersecting beamlet rotates about the center of the target. For targets away from machine isocenter (off-axis target), the intersecting beamlet scans across the target since the center of rotation is not at the location of the target. Expected dose profile shapes are shown at the bottom left.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) The DMG in the custom made acrylic insert for the Lucy phantom (b) the DMG mounted in the Lucy phantom.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Treatment duration for (a) 10 mm diameter targets and (b) 5 mm diameter targets for the cheese phantom plans.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Difference between the planned and the measured peak target doses in the Cheese phantom, normalized to the planned peak dose for (a) 10 mm diameter targets and (b) 5 mm diameter targets. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three measurements.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Planned and measured dose maps from the Lucy phantom at 9.7 cm off-axis. Dose maps represent the dose in Gy to the central, coronal plane of the Lucy phantom. The white tick marks represent 1 cm increments.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Planned and measured dose profile through the center of the targets. (a) and (b) the EBT2 film measured profiles through the 10 mm and 5 mm targets respectively. (c) and (d) the DMG measured profiles through the 10 mm and 5 mm targets respectively. The error bars on the EBT2 film and DMG data are the standard deviations of three measurements.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Distance the centre of a beamlet traverses over a target during one projection for 51 and 153 projections. The horizontal dotted line represents the width of one leaf when projected to isocenter. The inset figure shows the beamlet FWHM for each target at each gantry angle. This FWHM is the lateral dose coverage of each beamlet.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/8/10.1118/1.4736811
2012-07-19
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Improvements in dose calculation accuracy for small off-axis targets in high dose per fraction tomotherapy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/39/8/10.1118/1.4736811
10.1118/1.4736811
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM