No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Feasibility study of a synchronized-moving-grid (SMOG) system to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)
1. S. H. Bartling, O. Majdani, R. Gupta, T. Rodt, C. Dullin, P. F. Fitzgerald, and H. Becker, “Large scan field, high spatial resolution flat-panel detector based volumetric CT of the whole human skull base and for maxillofacial imaging,” Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 36, 317–327 (2007).
2. E. Daghini and L. O. Lerman, “Assessment of myocardial microvascular function: New opportunities in fast computed tomography,” Trends Cardiovasc. Med.17, 14–19 (2007).
3. D. A. Jaffray, J. H. Siewerdsen, J. W. Wong, and A. A. Martinez, “Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 53, 1337–1349 (2002).
6. B. Reichardt, A. Sarwar, S. H. Bartling, A. Cheung, M. Grasruck, C. Leidecker, M. A. Bredella, T. J. Brady, and R. Gupta, “Musculoskeletal applications of flat-panel volume CT,” Skeletal Radiol. 37, 1069–1076 (2008).
8. H. Schaaf, P. Streckbein, M. Obert, B. Goertz, P. Christophis, H. P. Howaldt, and H. Traupe, “High resolution imaging of craniofacial bone specimens by flat-panel volumetric computed tomography,” J. Craniomaxillofac Surg. 36, 234–238 (2008).
10. J. H. Siewerdsen, D. J. Moseley, S. Burch, S. K. Bisland, A. Bogaards, B. C. Wilson, and D. A. Jaffray, “Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: Pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery,” Med. Phys. 32, 241–254 (2005).
12. U. Neitzel, “Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: A model calculation,” Med. Phys. 19, 475–481 (1992).
14. J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography),” Med. Phys. 27, 1903–1914 (2000).
15. J. A. Sorenson, L. T. Niklason, and D. F. Knutti, “Performance characteristics of improved antiscatter grids,” Med. Phys. 7, 525–528 (1980).
16. J. H. Siewerdsen, D. J. Moseley, B. Bakhtiar, S. Richard, and D. A. Jaffray, “The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors,” Med. Phys. 31, 3506–3520 (2004).
17. S. A. Graham, D. J. Moseley, J. H. Siewerdsen, and D. A. Jaffray, “Compensators for dose and scatter management in cone-beam computed tomography,” Med. Phys. 34, 2691–2703 (2007).
18. F. C. Wagner, A. Macovski, and D. G. Nishimura, “Dual-energy x-ray projection imaging: Two sampling schemes for the correction of scattered radiation,” Med. Phys. 15, 732–748 (1988).
20. L. Zhu, N. R. Bennett, and R. Fahrig, “Scatter correction method for x-ray CT using primary modulation: Theory and preliminary results,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25, 1573–1587 (2006).
21. J. H. Siewerdsen, M. J. Daly, B. Bakhtiar, D. J. Moseley, S. Richard, H. Keller, and D. A. Jaffray, “A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT,” Med. Phys. 33, 187–197 (2006).
22. L. A. Love and R. A. Kruger, “Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering,” Med. Phys. 14, 178–185 (1987).
23. M. Kachelriess, K. Sourbelle, and W. A. Kalender, “Empirical cupping correction: A first-order raw data precorrection for cone-beam computed tomography,” Med. Phys. 33, 1269–1274 (2006).
24. J. Rinkel, L. Gerfault, F. Esteve, and J. M. Dinten, “A new method for x-ray scatter correction: First assessment on a cone-beam CT experimental setup,” Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 4633–4652 (2007).
25. Y. Kyriakou, T. Riedel, and W. A. Kalender, “Combining deterministic and Monte Carlo calculations for fast estimation of scatter intensities in CT,” Phys. Med. Biol.51, 4567–4586 (2006).
26. W. Yao and K. W. Leszczynski, “An analytical approach to estimating the first order scatter in heterogeneous medium. II. A practical application,” Med. Phys. 36, 3157–3167 (2009).
28. A. Jalink, J. McAdoo, G. Halama, and H. Liu, “CCD mosaic technique for large-field digital mammography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15, 260–267 (1996).
29. J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Effects of image lag,” Med. Phys. 26, 2635–2647 (1999).
30. N. Mail, D. J. Moseley, J. H. Siewerdsen, and D. A. Jaffray, “An empirical method for lag correction in cone-beam CT,” Med. Phys. 35, 5187–5196 (2008).
31. A. K. Bloomquist, M. J. Yaffe, G. E. Mawdsley, D. M. Hunter, and D. J. Beideck, “Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system,” Med. Phys. 33, 2998–3005 (2006).
32. C. Schroeder, T. Stanescu, S. Rathee, and B. G. Fallone, “Lag measurement in an a-Se active matrix flat-panel imager,” Med. Phys. 31, 1203–1209 (2004).
33. J. H. Siewerdsen and D. A. Jaffray, “A ghost story: Spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager,” Med. Phys. 26, 1624–1641 (1999).
34. R. Tanaka, K. Ichikawa, S. Mori, S. Dobashi, M. Kumagai, H. Kawashima, S. Minohara, and S. Sanada, “Investigation on effect of image lag in fluoroscopic images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) on accuracy of target tracking in radiotherapy,” J. Radiat. Res. 51, 723–731 (2010).
35. J. Y. Jin, L. Ren, Q. Liu, J. Kim, N. Wen, H. Guan, B. Movsas, and I. J. Chetty, “Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT),” Med. Phys. 37, 5634–5644 (2010).
36. N. Mail, P. O’Brien, and G. Pang, “Lag correction model and ghosting analysis for an indirect-conversion flat-panel imager,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 8, 137–146 (2007).
38. R. Fahrig, R. Dixon, T. Payne, R. L. Morin, A. Ganguly, and N. Strobel, “Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system,” Med. Phys. 33, 4541–4550 (2006).
39. W. Y. Song, S. Kamath, S. Ozawa, S. A. Ani, A. Chvetsov, N. Bhandare, J. R. Palta, C. Liu, and J. G. Li, “A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems,” Med. Phys. 35, 480–486 (2008).
40. H. C. Cheng, V. W. Wu, E. S. Liu, and D. L. Kwong, “Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 80, 291–300 2011).
41. A. C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomography (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1987).
42. S. Mori, M. Endo, K. Nishizawa, T. Tsunoo, T. Aoyama, H. Fujiwara, and K. Murase, “Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry,” Med. Phys. 32, 1061–1069 (2005).
43. S. Mori, M. Endo, K. Nishizawa, K. Murase, H. Fujiwara, and S. Tanada, “Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners,” Br. J. Radiol. 79, 56–61 (2006).
44. G. X. Ding and C. W. Coffey, “Radiation dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in an image-guided radiotherapy procedure,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 73, 610–617 (2009).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month