No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
The future h
-index is an excellent way to predict scientists' future impact
2. D. E. Acuna, S. Allesina, and K. P. Kording, “Future impact: Predicting scientific success,” Nature (London) 489, 201–202 (2012).
3. A. Abbott, D. Cyranoski, N. Jones, B. Maher, Q. Schiermeier, and R. Van Noorden, “Metrics: Do metrics matter?,” Nature (London) 465, 860–862 (2010).
10. O. Penner, A. M. Petersen, R. K. Pan, and S. Fortunato, “The case for caution in predicting scientists future impact,” Phys. Today 66(4), 8–9 (2013).
11. O. Penner, R. K. Pan, A. M. Petersen, K. Kaski, and S. Fortunato, “On the predictability of career achievement in science,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (submitted).
14. K. J. Bennett and G. W. Torrance, “Measuring health state preferences and utilities: Rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble techniques,” in Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd ed., edited by B. Spilker (Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, 1996), pp. 253–265.
Article metrics loading...
There is no abstract available for this article.
Full text loading...
Most read this month