Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/11/10.1118/1.4816659
1.
1. J. E. Hirsch, “An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(46), 1656916572 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
2.
2. D. E. Acuna, S. Allesina, and K. P. Kording, “Future impact: Predicting scientific success,” Nature (London) 489, 201202 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/489201a
3.
3. A. Abbott, D. Cyranoski, N. Jones, B. Maher, Q. Schiermeier, and R. Van Noorden, “Metrics: Do metrics matter?,” Nature (London) 465, 860862 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/465860a
4.
4. K. A. A. Dwan et al., “Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias,” PLoS ONE. 3(8), e3081 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003081
5.
5. J. K. Vanclay, “On the robustness of the h-index,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(10), 15471550 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20616
6.
6. N. A. Aziz and M. P. Rozing, “Profit (p)-index: The degree to which authors profit from co-authors,” PLoS ONE 8(4), e59814 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059814
7.
7. A. Jones, “The explosive growth of postdocs in computer science,” Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 56(2), 3739 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2408776.2408801
8.
8. J. Priem, P. Groth, and D. Taraborelli, “The altmetrics collection,” PLoS ONE 7(11), e48753 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048753
9.
9. A. Mazloumian, “Predicting scholars' scientific impact,” PLoS ONE 7, e49246 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049246
10.
10. O. Penner, A. M. Petersen, R. K. Pan, and S. Fortunato, “The case for caution in predicting scientists future impact,” Phys. Today 66(4), 89 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1928
11.
11. O. Penner, R. K. Pan, A. M. Petersen, K. Kaski, and S. Fortunato, “On the predictability of career achievement in science,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (submitted).
12.
12. R. Mannella and P. Rossi, “On the time dependence of the h-index,” J. Informetrics 7, 176182 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.10.003
13.
13.Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del sistema Universitario e della Ricerca, “Abilitazione scientifica nazionale - la normalizzazione degli indicatori per l'etá accademica,” (2013) [http://www.anvur.org/attachments/article/253/normalizzazione_indicatori_0.pdf].
14.
14. K. J. Bennett and G. W. Torrance, “Measuring health state preferences and utilities: Rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble techniques,” in Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd ed., edited by B. Spilker (Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, 1996), pp. 253265.
15.
15. M. A. García-Pérez, “Limited validity of equations to predict the future h index,” Scientometrics February, 19 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0979-7
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/11/10.1118/1.4816659
Loading
/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/11/10.1118/1.4816659
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aapm/journal/medphys/40/11/10.1118/1.4816659
2013-10-02
2016-07-26