No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography
1. American Cancer Society, “Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2011-2012” (American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 2012).
3. P. R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation,” Med. Phys. 29, 2131–2139 (2002).
4. P. R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture,” Med. Phys. 29, 2140–2151 (2002).
5. P. R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Mammogram synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation. III. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network,” Med. Phys. 30, 1914–1925 (2003).
6. P. R. Bakic, C. Zhang, and A. D. Maidment, “Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm,” Med. Phys. 38, 3165–3176 (2011).
7. B. A. Lau, I. Reiser, R. M. Nishikawa, and P. R. Bakic, “A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom,” Med. Phys. 39, 3375–3385 (2012).
9. K. Bliznakova, I. Sechopoulos, I. Buliev, and N. Pallikarakis, “BreastSimulator: A software platform for breast x-ray imaging research,” J. Biomed. Graph. Comput. 2, 1–14 (2012).
10. C. M. Li, W. P. Segars, G. D. Tourassi, J. M. Boone, J. T. Dobbins III, “Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data,” Med. Phys. 36, 3122–3131 (2009).
12. D. R. Dance, C. L. Skinner, K. C. Young, J. R. Beckett, and C. J. Kotre, “Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol,” Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000).
13. D. R. Dance, K. C. Young, and R. E. van Engen, “Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: Factors for use with the UK, European, and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols,” Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 453–471 (2011).
14. X. Wu, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography,” Radiology 179, 143–148 (1991).
15. X. Wu, E. L. Gingold, G. T. Barnes, and D. M. Tucker, “Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography,” Radiology 193, 83–89 (1994).
16. J. M. Boone, “Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: Computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data,” Med. Phys. 29, 869–875 (2002).
17. J. M. Boone, “Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment,” Radiology 213, 23–37 (1999).
18. I. Sechopoulos and C. J. D’Orsi, “Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 9, 161–171 (2008).
19. I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 34, 221–232 (2007).
20. D. R. Dance, R. A. Hunt, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson, “Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 359–363 (2005).
21. I. Reiser and R. M. Nishikawa, “Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: Effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise,” Med. Phys. 37, 1591–1600 (2010).
22. X. Gong, S. J. Glick, B. Liu, A. A. Vedula, and S. Thacker, “A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging,” Med. Phys. 33, 1041–1052 (2006).
23. L. Zhou, J. Oldan, P. Fisher, and G. Gindi, “Low-contrast lesion detection in tomosynthetic breast imaging using a realistic breast phantom,” Proc. SPIE 6142, 61425A–61412 (2006).
24. R. A. Hunt, D. R. Dance, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, M. Sandborg, G. Ullman, and G. Alm Carlsson, “Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 395–398 (2005).
26. F. J. P. Richard, P. R. Bakic, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Mammogram registration: A phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25, 188–197 (2006).
27. D. Kontos, C. Zhang, N. Ruiter, P. Bakic, and A. Maidment, “Evaluating the effect of tomosynthesis acquisition parameters on image texture: A study based on an anthropomorphic breast tissue software model,” in the Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Tucson, AZ, 2008), pp. 491–498.
28. S. S. J. Feng and I. Sechopoulos, “A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis,” Med. Phys. 38, 6643–6653 (2011).
29. I. Sechopoulos, S. Suryanarayanan, S. Vedantham, C. J. D’Orsi, and A. Karellas, “Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast,” Med. Phys. 34, 564–576 (2007).
30. A. K. W. Ma, D. G. Darambara, A. Stewart, S. Gunn, and E. Bullard, “Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum + silver x-ray anode-filter combinations,” Med. Phys. 35, 5278–5289 (2008).
31. N. Buls, I. Wathion, L. Mommaerts, C. Breucq, and J. de Mey, “Development of a multi-spectral, multi-geometry computational model for X-ray breast imaging,” Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 139, 343–347 (2010).
32. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2002).
33. T. Pavlidis, Algorithms for Graphics and Image Processing (Computer Science, Rockville, MD, 1982).
34. R. Chandrasekhar and Y. Attikiouzel, “A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 483–494 (1997).
35. T. F. Cootes and C. J. Taylor, “Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision,” Proc. SPIE 4322, 236–248 (2001).
36. I. T. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2002).
38. F. Pedersen, M. Bergströme, E. Bengtsson, and B. Långström, “Principal component analysis of dynamic positron emission tomography images,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 21, 1285–1292 (1994).
39. D. Rueckert, A. Frangi, and J. Schnabel, “Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models using nonrigid registration,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI (Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001), pp. 77–84.
41. J. M. Boone, K. K. Lindfors, V. N. Cooper III, and J. A. Seibert, “Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive results,” Med. Phys. 27, 2408–2416 (2000).
42. I. Sechopoulos, S. S. J. Feng, and C. J. D’Orsi, “Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype,” Med. Phys. 37, 4110–4120 (2010).
45. C. Zhou, H. P. Chan, N. Petrick, M. A. Helvie, M. M. Goodsitt, B. Sahiner, and L. M. Hadjiiski, “Computerized image analysis: Estimation of breast density on mammograms,” Med. Phys. 28, 1056–1069 (2001).
46. M. M. Goodsitt, H. P. Chan, B. Liu, S. V. Guru, A. R. Morton, S. Keshavmurthy, and N. Petrick, “Classification of compressed breast shapes for the design of equalization filters in x-ray mammography,” Med. Phys. 25, 937–948 (1998).
47. R. J. Ferrari, R. M. Rangayyan, J. E. L. Desautels, R. A. Borges, and A. F. Frere, “Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 42, 201–208 (2004).
48. S. M. Kwok, R. Chandrasekhar, Y. Attikiouzel, and M. T. Rickard, “Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 1129–1140 (2004).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month